Historic archive of defunct list bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bismark-devel] Verifying/classifying/prioritizing bugs on a regular basis
@ 2011-04-17 15:21 Dave Taht
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2011-04-17 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bismark-devel

1) I have a few people that get notified of new bug and feature requests 
by default on the bismark issues page.

I can add more, let me know.

2) It would be good if various people could walk down the existing bug 
and feature list and verify that a given bug exists, and comment on it 
as to how to perhaps fix the problem.

And take ownership, provide an estimate as to how long it will take to 
fix, add a start date, add watchers to people that might be interested, etc.

http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bismark/issues for everything 
outstanding.

As a simple example, I'd like someone to replicate and verify that bug 
88 exists...

3) Quite often this above task requires a joint, scheduled meeting, as 
doing this sort of triage is not a lot of fun - but it is not required 
to do it in person, over irc works well.

4) The default catagories of people on the list may not be correct. The 
people with manager perms can promote/demote people into the right 
catagories. For example, I'm closer to being a developer than a 
contributor on this project...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-04-17 15:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-17 15:21 [Bismark-devel] Verifying/classifying/prioritizing bugs on a regular basis Dave Taht

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox