Historic archive of defunct list bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <d@taht.net>
To: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] time 1.7
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:38:52 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DAB41CC.7050406@taht.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DAB2686.5000004@gatech.edu>

On 04/17/2011 11:42 AM, Srikanth Sundaresan wrote:
> Does anyone know how to get GNU time 1.7? The current version of time on
> the build is incompatible with some of our measurement scripts.
>

General tip: when trying to figure out where a utility comes from, you 
can generally do a:

$ dpkg --search /usr/bin/time
time: /usr/bin/time

Which in this case shows that ubuntu/debian time comes from the time 
package.

You can then

$ mkdir ~/src/time; cd $_; apt-get source time

to see more about that package and its source.

Anyway...

The version of time in the build is the busybox version, which as you've 
noted is quite limited. It would be a good idea to go through the 
busybox configuration screen and figure out what additional features are 
needed, and what can be dropped. (be gentle here)

In this case, if you really need gnu time,  it would be best to add gnu 
time as an openwrt package,
and then drop the applet from the busybox build after it works. 
Regrettably it is not already packaged up in openwrt.

Alternatively, the busybox folk are good on accepting patches, so you 
could modify busybox to support the syntax for time that you need. As 
src goes, busybox is VERY modular and easy to deal with.

Either way, note this problem in the wiki's issues page. I can see how 
lacking a good timing utility would be a big problem!

> - Srikanth
> _______________________________________________
> Bismark-devel mailing list
> Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-17 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-17 17:42 Srikanth Sundaresan
2011-04-17 19:38 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2011-04-17 19:44   ` [Bismark-devel] [#92] Additional time syntax? Dave Taht
2011-04-18  1:04     ` Dave Taht
2011-04-18  1:18       ` Srikanth Sundaresan
2011-04-18  1:22         ` Dave Taht
2011-04-18  1:27           ` [Bismark-devel] Coping with email notifications from redmine Dave Taht
2011-04-18  2:22         ` [Bismark-devel] [#92] Additional time syntax? Nick Feamster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DAB41CC.7050406@taht.net \
    --to=d@taht.net \
    --cc=bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox