From: Kim Hawtin <kim@hawtin.net.au>
To: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] switching issue on device
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:51:35 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DAB840F.3070903@hawtin.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DDDACEAA-0264-43EE-B5A8-8EB80A2BF307@cc.gatech.edu>
On 18/04/11 00:22, Nick Feamster wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2011, at 10:46 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> I'm mildly confused as to your topology here. Diagram?
>>
>> You are behind NAT by default, so if you try to ping through the WAN
> port to something anything inside the LAN, those machines will be unreachable.
> You should however, be able to ping from the wireless to anywhere wired,
> LAN or WAN port. If you have AP isolation turned on in the wireless side,
> you cannot ping any other wireless connection, and I'm unsure what the
> behavior is for wired to wireless in that case.
>
> I'm just talking about my LAN here:
>
> SERVER<----(2.4 GHz wireless, SSID "foo") ----> WNDR3700<---- (wired LAN port) ----> Access Point 2
>
> * When I associate to AP2, I can ping SERVER, and resolve MDNS names.
> * When I log into WNDR, I can ping SERVER
> * When I associate to the WNDR3700, I can neither ping the server, nor resolve MDNS names.
>
> So, isn't it strange that everything works when I'm connected via AP2,
> but not via the WNDR? By my reasoning, all of the traffic that I'm
> sending when I'm connected via AP2 would have to go through the WNDR anyhow...
I am not sure how relevant my experience is here, as I am not using a
WNDR3700. I have seen this behavior on other APs. I have a hunch that
its related to how ARP is treated on the AP. In my case specifically on
WPA2 on a modern Billion device that does ADSL2+/AP/VoIP. This behavior
generally does not seem to be an issue on an open network or using WEP.
I noticed this last weekend when I was setting up my server at home to
to builds on, transfering files around with rsync/scp/etc
Only when *both* hosts on the wireless have ping'd the AP can then you
ping the other hosts from wireless to wireless...
([laptop A], [laptop B]) --wifi-wpa2--> [AP] <--wired-- [server]
For example I can not ping [laptop B] from [laptop A], both being on the
wireless using WPA2, until I ping the AP from both laptops. I can
however ping the [server] from both laptops. However I can not ping
either latptop from [server] until the laptop has ping'd [AP]. There is
currently no mdns in use by any of these devices.
Perhaps the AP is building an internal table using mdns to
allow/identify traffic across its interfaces?
regards,
Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-18 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-17 14:36 Nick Feamster
2011-04-17 14:46 ` Dave Taht
2011-04-17 14:52 ` Nick Feamster
2011-04-18 0:21 ` Kim Hawtin [this message]
2011-04-18 1:45 ` Dave Taht
2011-04-18 4:59 ` Kim Hawtin
2011-04-18 2:19 ` Nick Feamster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DAB840F.3070903@hawtin.net.au \
--to=kim@hawtin.net.au \
--cc=bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox