From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-14-ewr.dyndns.com (mxout-091-ewr.mailhop.org [216.146.33.91]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F5F2E0419 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scan-12-ewr.mailhop.org (scan-12-ewr.local [10.0.141.230]) by mail-14-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23959CEC9F for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 01:22:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 () X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 149.20.54.64 Received: from mainmail.teklibre.com (toutatis.isc.org [149.20.54.64]) by mail-14-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E229CC90D; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 01:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mainmail.teklibre.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8591C3DA139; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mainmail.teklibre.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (toutatis.sql1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ziJ4MrETXMVz; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (c-68-39-173-20.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [68.39.173.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: d) by mainmail.teklibre.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB2EE3DA121; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:57:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DAB926A.7020203@taht.net> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:22:50 -0600 From: Dave Taht User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Srikanth Sundaresan References: <4DAB2686.5000004@gatech.edu> <4DAB41CC.7050406@taht.net> <4DAB4303.4050002@taht.net> <4DAB8E09.8090309@taht.net> <526399DE-DC11-4DAE-93D9-061355FB4466@gatech.edu> In-Reply-To: <526399DE-DC11-4DAE-93D9-061355FB4466@gatech.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gburdell@lists.bufferbloat.net, bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] [#92] Additional time syntax? X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: BISMark related software development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 01:22:59 -0000 On 04/17/2011 07:18 PM, Srikanth Sundaresan wrote: > I just quickly tested it. It seems to be what we want, and also seems to work. Will test it properly with the script and update. > > Thanks for the quick response. Anything to avoid finishing my taxes. > Was meaning to get back on the syntax email but got tied up with other stuff. Well, I'll argue that making busybox's time command more complete would be a better option, so knowing the syntax you need for "time" on this bug report would be good. But my goal at the moment is to quickly prototype as many of the core requirements as possible, so we know what needs to be done and fixed, and I figure you have a major dependency on accurate time.