From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from deliverator3.gatech.edu (deliverator3.gatech.edu [130.207.165.163]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64250201A6B for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:20:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from deliverator3.gatech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 77F89155B3D for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:21:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail6.gatech.edu (mail6.gatech.edu [130.207.185.166]) by deliverator3.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC1B155C3B; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:21:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [143.215.129.202] (galapagos.cc.gt.atl.ga.us [143.215.129.202]) (Authenticated sender: ssundaresan3) by mail6.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C240F2259CA; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:21:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DB7374C.80302@gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:21:16 -0400 From: Srikanth Sundaresan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Poole, Brian" References: <4DB73621.5000401@gatech.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] bismark-active X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: BISMark related software development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:20:54 -0000 I think eventually we will go with that. The only thing I don't like about that is it's hard to remember whose is which. :) On 04/26/2011 05:18 PM, Poole, Brian wrote: > We can add auto-device naming if we decide on the convention to use. I had the MAC address (based on eth0) one mocked up before. Shall we just go with that? ? > > Brian > ________________________________________ > From: bismark-devel-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net [bismark-devel-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] on behalf of Srikanth Sundaresan [srikanth@gatech.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 5:16 PM > To: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > Subject: [Bismark-devel] bismark-active > > bismark-mgmt seems to work. It needs some more testing, and there's also > a manual component (naming the device), but it seems to be in good shape. > > To start testing bismark-active, we need the following scripts: > > bismark-measure-active > bismark-tr > bismark-rtr > bismark-ping > bismark-netperf > bismark-netperf-thread > bismark-dns > bismark-ditg > bismark-sp > > The binaries: > shaperprobe > ITGRecv > ITGSend > ITGDec > > packages: > gnu-time > bind-host > curl(preferable, but not necessary) > > - Srikanth > _______________________________________________ > Bismark-devel mailing list > Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel