From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
Received: from deliverator5.gatech.edu (deliverator5.gatech.edu
	[130.207.165.165])
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66422004FF
	for <bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Fri, 20 May 2011 15:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from deliverator5.gatech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id EBBE5180DC3;
	Fri, 20 May 2011 18:13:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail5.gatech.edu (mail5.gatech.edu [130.207.185.165])
	by deliverator5.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E67D18354D;
	Fri, 20 May 2011 18:13:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from kenmore-square.home.lan (dsl-185-155-129.dynamic.wa.co.za
	[41.185.155.129]) (Authenticated sender: nf21@mail.gatech.edu)
	by mail5.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48CAE2001D;
	Fri, 20 May 2011 18:13:02 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=GOX_dZXWO0092NSP-PhB8rGkc6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 00:12:58 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5C1FCBFC-B007-4B01-A7BA-6CCD5523DC34@cc.gatech.edu>
References: <BANLkTim+YwjyEUG24YeCBWqpyGkFx7pdGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<9EFCAA58-92E8-45FD-9BE4-F213564264E6@cc.gatech.edu>
	<C6BAF6EA-51BD-413E-98BA-7F720E42AA25@cc.gatech.edu>
	<BANLkTi=GOX_dZXWO0092NSP-PhB8rGkc6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] about ready to do another build
X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: BISMark related software development
	<bismark-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bismark-devel>,
	<mailto:bismark-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bismark-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bismark-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel>,
	<mailto:bismark-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 22:01:23 -0000

Srikanth, Walter --- please chime in.

Dave has a point here about the possibility of stopping QoS during =
testing.

Thoughts?

-Nick


On May 21, 2011, at 12:11 AM, Dave Taht wrote:

> And your customer experience will be poor, and you will be measuring =
tcp/ip malfunctioning rather than working properly.=20
>=20
> How hard would it be for your scripts, when doing bandwidth testing, =
to do a=20
>=20
> /etc/init.d/qos stop
> do the test
> /etc/init.d/qos start
> =20
> When do they do bandwidth testing? What script does it?