From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
Received: from deliverator4.gatech.edu (deliverator4.gatech.edu
	[130.207.160.70])
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDB3201A73
	for <bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 31 May 2011 07:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from deliverator4.gatech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id E97055E4744
	for <bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 31 May 2011 10:56:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail2.gatech.edu (mail2.gatech.edu [130.207.185.162])
	by deliverator4.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0685E4076
	for <bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 31 May 2011 10:56:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.109] (dsl-185-162-19.dynamic.wa.co.za
	[41.185.162.19]) (Authenticated sender: nf21@mail.gatech.edu)
	by mail2.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBB56185DBD
	for <bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 31 May 2011 10:56:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:56:24 +0200
Message-Id: <5FC6E7BF-B18B-4D41-A80A-84030C79115E@cc.gatech.edu>
To: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Subject: [Bismark-devel] repo locations + source code license?
X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: BISMark related software development
	<bismark-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bismark-devel>,
	<mailto:bismark-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bismark-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bismark-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel>,
	<mailto:bismark-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 14:39:48 -0000

for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source code is =
publicly available.

"Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e., open source) and =
any non-personally identifiable data collected through the software tool =
must be made available, upon request, to the public for independent =
analysis."

1. What license are we going to use?

2. Should we move to github.com today?  I am happy to try to migrate the =
network dashboard code into there.  What about: (1) the BISMark firmware =
build; (2) BISMark?

For the firmware and management software, I'm actually not sure if the =
repositories are currently public?

How should we handle this issue?

-Nick=