From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from deliverator4.gatech.edu (deliverator4.gatech.edu [130.207.160.70]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C85D201A63 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from deliverator4.gatech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AF5D5E4738; Tue, 31 May 2011 11:37:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail5.gatech.edu (mail5.gatech.edu [130.207.185.165]) by deliverator4.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9918F5E473F; Tue, 31 May 2011 11:37:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (dsl-185-162-19.dynamic.wa.co.za [41.185.162.19]) (Authenticated sender: nf21@mail.gatech.edu) by mail5.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1511C20005; Tue, 31 May 2011 11:37:12 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Nick Feamster In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:37:08 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <614A5E13-6E88-4F01-9182-4D45147678C0@cc.gatech.edu> References: <5FC6E7BF-B18B-4D41-A80A-84030C79115E@cc.gatech.edu> <4629388C-A50B-44DD-A5D7-57B830E1B30A@cc.gatech.edu> <8FBAB478-A012-47BB-A606-EC99715B160C@cc.gatech.edu> To: Walter de Donato X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] repo locations + source code license? X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: BISMark related software development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:20:30 -0000 Do you have access to the "bismark-devel" user on github? On May 31, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Walter de Donato wrote: > Sold! :-) >=20 >=20 > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster > Yes. "bismark-firmware" (singular) seems good. >=20 > On May 31, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Walter de Donato wrote: >=20 > > Why don't bismark-firmwares? > > > > Walter > > > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster > > Yes, I think perhaps bismark builds could be kept in a separate = repo. > > > > Not sure what we could call that one. bismark-router? > > > > -Nick > > > > On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Walter de Donato wrote: > > > > > I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses. > > > I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL would be more = appropriate. > > > What do you think? > > > > > > I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't start yet = doing it. > > > Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas? > > > > > > Walter > > > > > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster > > > for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source code is = publicly available. > > > > > > "Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e., open = source) and any non-personally identifiable data collected through the = software tool must be made available, upon request, to the public for = independent analysis." > > > > > > 1. What license are we going to use? > > > > > > 2. Should we move to github.com today? I am happy to try to = migrate the network dashboard code into there. What about: (1) the = BISMark firmware build; (2) BISMark? > > > > > > For the firmware and management software, I'm actually not sure if = the repositories are currently public? > > > > > > How should we handle this issue? > > > > > > -Nick > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Bismark-devel mailing list > > > Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Walter de Donato, PhD Student > > > Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica > > > Universit=E0 degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II" > > > Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy) > > > Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816 > > > Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it > > > WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato > > > > > > > > > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20