From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
Received: from deliverator5.gatech.edu (deliverator5.gatech.edu
	[130.207.165.165])
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1FB2004FF
	for <bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Fri, 20 May 2011 15:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from deliverator5.gatech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CB1E1834E7;
	Fri, 20 May 2011 18:35:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail6.gatech.edu (mail6.gatech.edu [130.207.185.166])
	by deliverator5.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E3F182615;
	Fri, 20 May 2011 18:35:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from kenmore-square.home.lan (dsl-185-155-129.dynamic.wa.co.za
	[41.185.155.129]) (Authenticated sender: nf21@mail.gatech.edu)
	by mail6.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B5C7225BA1;
	Fri, 20 May 2011 18:35:39 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=546o2tLPbdXqgj-1AZFrTaUcURQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 00:35:33 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B52DD8EA-1E9B-4FAC-9796-9C88A4D83FBE@cc.gatech.edu>
References: <BANLkTim+YwjyEUG24YeCBWqpyGkFx7pdGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<9EFCAA58-92E8-45FD-9BE4-F213564264E6@cc.gatech.edu>
	<C6BAF6EA-51BD-413E-98BA-7F720E42AA25@cc.gatech.edu>
	<BANLkTi=GOX_dZXWO0092NSP-PhB8rGkc6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<5C1FCBFC-B007-4B01-A7BA-6CCD5523DC34@cc.gatech.edu>
	<BANLkTindJ5fB1TOMC3NtuvvDygyxMoJ3Vw@mail.gmail.com>
	<048ECF4E-9E70-4957-90B4-ACD3C0D7AD44@cc.gatech.edu>
	<BANLkTi=546o2tLPbdXqgj-1AZFrTaUcURQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] about ready to do another build
X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: BISMark related software development
	<bismark-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bismark-devel>,
	<mailto:bismark-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bismark-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bismark-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel>,
	<mailto:bismark-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 22:23:59 -0000


On May 21, 2011, at 12:28 AM, Dave Taht wrote:

>=20
> And btw, what are the results of a speedtest from your location =
without QoS on?
>=20

Have run it 2x now.

I see about 850 kbps down and 400 kbps up.

The default upload setting is abusive.

> With QoS on, set to up/dl values within a few percentage points of =
that (and the overhead calculation disabled)
>=20
> I can bake a better default into the next build, but I was figuring =
you'd be lucky to be gettting 1000 down....
>=20
> I want to note that according to your previous study, the first 30 =
seconds of data need to be discarded in order for a speedtest to be =
valid, and speedtest.net doesn't do that...

Yep yep... though I don't think PowerBoost is enabled over here.  =
Although, we'll find out. :-)

-Nick=