From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3785A20175B for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 06:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iyi20 with SMTP id 20so3125634iyi.16 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 06:44:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=kh8KiLv3qwXHoeTWhVLAHOZYDpq3yqgp9PLOyAfDrHM=; b=nIfrxkHc8LXuPrjYi9vyjONVPnpIIbIBL2qd+xj7eTw4U0lEhVGPxJIZmpFfQl2LAa Mb59uKhV8W3H7Ce7V0ya0TdIwo+O+eIiFqkWfSNH3dI3nJKtNWAt9Jlzzdxac074Iv8h GYy3HcRgWCf63LDxQ8TZGSrxfIADN5CHaJR34= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=gwOzwYYtKqrSb/Fi7z0Kox1PlJUkf2lHTGObYy4pSBU/SSShRyM7VeS3wEE3b3gUv9 bmGfjdU7g9OiYix9t/FtCHbVJvRVjZ0pRksfZS9y95+kHbT3mxZin/xXRfodZD9K7WFn +SEJqrFU7mudiCY4dQnOQmPlhOMZL+Ri7yTb0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.253.87 with SMTP id mz23mr3467756ibb.197.1306590246627; Sat, 28 May 2011 06:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.39.203 with HTTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 06:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 07:44:06 -0600 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555dc36846bb204a4563f2c Subject: [Bismark-devel] Restructuring repositories X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: BISMark related software development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 13:28:50 -0000 --00032555dc36846bb204a4563f2c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I sat down to try and describe where everything comes from in the hope that a coherent plan would arise: http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bismark/wiki/Repository_structure You can see my strong preference for obsoleting svn is because roughly 99.99% of the other source code in use is in git. That said, coming up with a sane scheme for moving forward faster and in sync, supporting other platforms such as the buffalo, etc, could use some discussion. --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://the-edge.blogspot.com --00032555dc36846bb204a4563f2c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I sat down to try and describe where everything comes from in the hope that= a coherent plan would arise:

http://www.buffer= bloat.net/projects/bismark/wiki/Repository_structure

You can see my strong preference for obsoleting svn is because roughly = 99.99% of the other source code in use is in git.

That said, coming = up with a sane scheme for moving forward faster and in sync, supporting oth= er platforms such as the buffalo, etc, could use some discussion.



--
Dave T=E4ht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608=
http://the-e= dge.blogspot.com
--00032555dc36846bb204a4563f2c--