From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.unina.it (smtp1.unina.it [192.132.34.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 624CF201A63 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qw0-f43.google.com (mail-qw0-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.unina.it (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4VFdF6Y014517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:39:16 +0200 Received: by qwf6 with SMTP id 6so3237621qwf.16 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:39:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.56.148 with SMTP id y20mr4314832qcg.283.1306856355000; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.88.66 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <614A5E13-6E88-4F01-9182-4D45147678C0@cc.gatech.edu> References: <5FC6E7BF-B18B-4D41-A80A-84030C79115E@cc.gatech.edu> <4629388C-A50B-44DD-A5D7-57B830E1B30A@cc.gatech.edu> <8FBAB478-A012-47BB-A606-EC99715B160C@cc.gatech.edu> <614A5E13-6E88-4F01-9182-4D45147678C0@cc.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:39:14 +0200 Message-ID: From: Walter de Donato To: Nick Feamster Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5cb62cff1d804a49434b4 Cc: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] repo locations + source code license? X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: BISMark related software development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:22:33 -0000 --000e0cd5cb62cff1d804a49434b4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think so... I'm currently setting up everything to start importing the Bismark repository. 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster > Do you have access to the "bismark-devel" user on github? > > On May 31, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Walter de Donato wrote: > > > Sold! :-) > > > > > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster > > Yes. "bismark-firmware" (singular) seems good. > > > > On May 31, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Walter de Donato wrote: > > > > > Why don't bismark-firmwares? > > > > > > Walter > > > > > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster > > > Yes, I think perhaps bismark builds could be kept in a separate repo. > > > > > > Not sure what we could call that one. bismark-router? > > > > > > -Nick > > > > > > On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Walter de Donato wrote: > > > > > > > I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses. > > > > I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL would be more > appropriate. > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't start yet doi= ng > it. > > > > Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas? > > > > > > > > Walter > > > > > > > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster > > > > for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source code is > publicly available. > > > > > > > > "Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e., open source= ) > and any non-personally identifiable data collected through the software t= ool > must be made available, upon request, to the public for independent > analysis." > > > > > > > > 1. What license are we going to use? > > > > > > > > 2. Should we move to github.com today? I am happy to try to migrat= e > the network dashboard code into there. What about: (1) the BISMark firmw= are > build; (2) BISMark? > > > > > > > > For the firmware and management software, I'm actually not sure if > the repositories are currently public? > > > > > > > > How should we handle this issue? > > > > > > > > -Nick > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Bismark-devel mailing list > > > > Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Walter de Donato, PhD Student > > > > Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica > > > > Universit=E0 degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II" > > > > Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy) > > > > Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816 > > > > Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it > > > > WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --=20 Walter de Donato, PhD Student Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica Universit=E0 degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II" Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy) Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816 Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato --000e0cd5cb62cff1d804a49434b4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think so...=A0
I'm currently setting up everything to start impor= ting the Bismark repository.


2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
Do you have access to the "bismark-dev= el" user on github?

On May 31, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:

> Sold! :-)
>
>
> 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <= feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
> Yes. =A0"bismark-firmware" (singular) seems good.
>
> On May 31, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
>
> > Why don't bismark-firmwares?
> >
> > Walter
> >
> > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
> > Yes, I think perhaps bismark builds could be kept in a separate r= epo.
> >
> > Not sure what we could call that one. =A0bismark-router?
> >
> > -Nick
> >
> > On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
> >
> > > I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses.
> > > I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL wou= ld be more appropriate.
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't st= art yet doing it.
> > > Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas?=
> > >
> > > Walter
> > >
> > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
> > > for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source co= de is publicly available.
> > >
> > > "Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e.,= open source) and any non-personally identifiable data collected through th= e software tool must be made available, upon request, to the public for ind= ependent analysis."
> > >
> > > 1. What license are we going to use?
> > >
> > > 2. Should we move to github.com today? =A0I am happy to try to migrate the network = dashboard code into there. =A0What about: (1) the BISMark firmware build; (= 2) BISMark?
> > >
> > > For the firmware and management software, I'm actually n= ot sure if the repositories are currently public?
> > >
> > > How should we handle this issue?
> > >
> > > -Nick
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bismark-devel mailing list
> > > Bisma= rk-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel=
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Walter de Donato, PhD Student
> > > Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
> > > Universit=E0 =A0degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"= ;
> > > Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
> > > Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
> > > Email: walter.de= donato@unina.it
> > > WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>





--
Walter de D= onato, PhD Student
Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
Univers= it=E0=A0 degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
Via Claudio 21 --= 80125 Napoli (Italy)
Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
Email: walter.dedonato@unina.itWWW: = http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato

--000e0cd5cb62cff1d804a49434b4--