Why don't bismark-firmwares?

Walter

2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>

> Yes, I think perhaps bismark builds could be kept in a separate repo.
>
> Not sure what we could call that one.  bismark-router?
>
> -Nick
>
> On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
>
> > I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses.
> > I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL would be more
> appropriate.
> > What do you think?
> >
> > I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't start yet doing it.
> > Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas?
> >
> > Walter
> >
> > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
> > for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source code is
> publicly available.
> >
> > "Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e., open source) and
> any non-personally identifiable data collected through the software tool
> must be made available, upon request, to the public for independent
> analysis."
> >
> > 1. What license are we going to use?
> >
> > 2. Should we move to github.com today?  I am happy to try to migrate the
> network dashboard code into there.  What about: (1) the BISMark firmware
> build; (2) BISMark?
> >
> > For the firmware and management software, I'm actually not sure if the
> repositories are currently public?
> >
> > How should we handle this issue?
> >
> > -Nick
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bismark-devel mailing list
> > Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Walter de Donato, PhD Student
> > Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
> > Università  degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
> > Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
> > Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
> > Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it
> > WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato
> >
>
>
>