From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59129201ACC for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iyi20 with SMTP id 20so7409129iyi.16 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 17:34:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=NLBQIPndIJ7iDNPAs9pUnfDFxkxLpDc9JmbK77VkbAI=; b=BRatg6G7oXeUx3CCfgtI6SJA0TanN3ly5WnBaJT+DLKC42a3IgHk4PCz1xB5e/f10S V8EJ1MekONivbs0aWPG82KpvW+dMEhM732TBNJBbXd8eDhePAetRe8nV5aIu29bR3yld 3n4jl28iCxbv4KpmxDV5Z9j7e6OU51rynTuxE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=fjhuCvk0GQ9xXEEndtFYhh2M7VHeHME7E1ypjGUvK2N48WxvBmay8h94KXxKyIXVo/ HvWDWgWzuNJs9SdXwXBbheCj/9RqxQxBh4vVzEr/6D4oaIh64lkmwP5pebPfuzcOAZbp B9VkTT8G88dl8RFQMGKaWwE7sq7oHTpteaIuQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.92.206 with SMTP id s14mr4866237ibm.106.1304987685216; Mon, 09 May 2011 17:34:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.31.201 with HTTP; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:34:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:34:44 -0600 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec543204a69e20e04a2e11fbf Subject: [Bismark-devel] latest capetown builds are up X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: BISMark related software development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 00:28:13 -0000 --bcaec543204a69e20e04a2e11fbf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I did builds for the wndr3700v2, the buffalo, the various ubiquity products (including the nanostation M5s I have). They are at: http://huchra.bufferbloat.net/~bismark/ A full sysupgrade -n or tftp factory reflash is still required. A build for an x86 virtual kvm instance should be popping out shortly. I kind of hope that that "just works" because it will make it somewhat easier to improve the various interfaces if virtualized. (e.g. the web landing pag= e is dismal, I just captured some links) There is a great deal of polish needed but most of the core functionality and packages are in there now. I'm aware of a half dozen small bugs already= , what I'm concerned about are big (crash) bugs. Anything other than the wndr3700v2 is completely untested and is probably a= t least somewhat misconfigured. I've done a basic smoketest of the wndr3700v2= , however, and it seems ok. PLEASE TEST on the routers you have. I need to test against the nano-m5s next as I hope to use them to "drive" the testbed to some extent. After a nap. Also: If anyone already has the kvm virtual machine code installed and working on their main hardware, please see if you can get the kvm instance running and let us know how on the wiki. Please remember that to configure the router, you will need to go to the address:81, at least at present. (I put the other hardware on different addresses than .42.1) opkg.conf still points to the wrong place. --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://the-edge.blogspot.com --bcaec543204a69e20e04a2e11fbf Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I did builds for the wndr3700v2, the buffalo, the various ubiquity products= (including the nanostation M5s I have).

They are at:

http://huchra.bufferbloat.net/= ~bismark/

A full sysupgrade -n or tftp factory reflash is still required.
A build for an x86 virtual kvm instance should be popping out shortly. I k= ind of hope that that "just works" because it will make it somewh= at easier to improve the various interfaces if virtualized. (e.g. the web l= anding page is dismal, I just captured some links)

There is a great deal of polish needed but most of the core functionali= ty and packages are in there now. I'm aware of a half dozen small bugs = already, what I'm concerned about are big (crash) bugs.

Anything= other than the wndr3700v2 is completely untested and is probably at least = somewhat misconfigured. I've done a basic smoketest of the wndr3700v2, = however, and it seems ok.

PLEASE TEST on the routers you have. I need to test against the nano-m5= s next as I hope to use them to "drive" the testbed to some exten= t. After a nap.

Also:

If anyone already has the kvm virtual m= achine code installed and working on their main hardware, please see if you= can get the kvm instance running and let us know how on the wiki.

Please remember that to configure the router, you will need to go to th= e address:81, at least at present. (I put the other hardware on different a= ddresses than .42.1)

opkg.conf still points to the wrong place.



--
Dave T=E4ht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: = 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com
--bcaec543204a69e20e04a2e11fbf--