Historic archive of defunct list bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
Cc: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] Buffalo WZR-HP-G301NH appears useful
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 13:40:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikRNAQRb1qKaQ=Nrbn_mJZjd4GDEg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimciDMsCLAzTCGqOiqhkjWFYKB3=g@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2670 bytes --]

WZR-HP-G300NH appears to be a slightly earlier version of this model.

IF we're going to try doing a build and testing against another breed of
router, I'd love it if two could be here by wednesday.... or drop the idea
entirely for capetown.

Go/no go decision/purchase please?

They are readily available from newegg and elsewhere, via google search....

http://www.google.com/products/catalog?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=WZR-HP-G300NH&oe=utf-8&um=1&ie=UTF-8&cid=1565461241313739995&sa=X&ei=2ELITau7GIHg0QG2_9WxCA&ved=0CFEQ8wIwAA#


On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, more important to me right now is knowing how many wndr3700v2 routers
> we can QA *right now*, and when the next 10 are arriving.
>
> And seriously, everywhere I've been in the 3rd world, 2.4 ghz is HOPELESSly
> polluted.
>
> So the wndr3700v2 remains the best in breed for us.
>
> But: sure, firing up a build for the buffalo and testing that in parallel
> won't take much time, and I LOVE having multiple vendors for stuff that
> could be obsoleted at any second. Netgear's CTO has never got back to me on
> assuring supply....
>
> And any time you can cut the BOM in half, is a good time.
>
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>wrote:
>
>> The SamKnows guys also pointed us to this router as a possibility.
>>
>> Should we get a few to play with here during your visit?
>>
>> -Nick
>>
>> On May 4, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> > Although we are having GREAT results with the wndr3700v2 on both the
>> bismark and iscwrt projects, word is that the Buffalo WZR-HP-G301NH is the
>> same hardware, and comes with 32MB flash/64MB ram, and costs less than 70
>> dollars from newegg.
>> >
>> > I personally happen to be a huge fan of 5.x ghz technology (2.4 ghz is
>> hopelessly polluted) but for those out there that don't need 5.Xghz, and
>> want to save on costs (the wndr3700v2 is 139 dollars)...
>> >
>> > AND wants to play with one of these buffalo routers, I'm willing to
>> start doing builds for it...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Dave Täht
>> > SKYPE: davetaht
>> > US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
>> > http://the-edge.blogspot.com
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Bismark-devel mailing list
>> > Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> SKYPE: davetaht
> US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
> http://the-edge.blogspot.com
>



-- 
Dave Täht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4165 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-09 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-04 17:26 Dave Taht
2011-05-04 17:27 ` Nick Feamster
2011-05-04 17:31   ` Dave Taht
2011-05-09 19:40     ` Dave Taht [this message]
2011-05-09 20:28       ` Nick Feamster
     [not found]         ` <BANLkTindwwmoBye_=jHva5D==py5bzPjiA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <48079E0D-D4D1-4EEF-9190-C9D342954A96@cc.gatech.edu>
     [not found]             ` <BANLkTi=-R2kcQkozQ=eJA8tQLTLu8TQg7g@mail.gmail.com>
2011-05-09 21:17               ` Nick Feamster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTikRNAQRb1qKaQ=Nrbn_mJZjd4GDEg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=feamster@cc.gatech.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox