From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 869A8201A4D for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iyi20 with SMTP id 20so992385iyi.16 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:07:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vjzFdeHnwT6/50YHexfwpsYYtBkyDHpxFJBEHZ9zsrQ=; b=aq4rk6KSWI/+RxpwcvCxXF1ixQMznX0Vinc0XV6cnCbWQiL4d1m2qoI7hi+lz+2wB8 b/u89ncB2w7Zqduppz5Kq8/joNGkAfYCSGu2AVLKoQwKq2uBrFVFUfXRBXSAgaE0/bNt XR1OVKmWvJmkjuojSoh0WnS5iwskesA56KFsM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ka25qTs1q9tBd8JrKbTZMtKCPYWACJzN2yAkilRKihXiLF3b9S+S/oIZmBK9LydpaF wSQJq7+G/S27s+PjnR8HxoTZF1XE8PD9lS4FdP06F4bkDqLhrKQF89m0SqOPExoUTVNs KUvRIHdFJOsMR+fgViKLFCtqyv+rHE39+oBUM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.205.88 with SMTP id fp24mr737075ibb.21.1303834057361; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.34.77 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:07:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <437483DB-4EBD-4476-953A-8E086FEF45A1@cc.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:07:37 -0600 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] some thoughts on continuous builds X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: BISMark related software development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:07:20 -0000 An example of a bug that I would like to see isolated and fixed before the next big development/Test cycle is: http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/88 As it would make it simpler to reflash devices with entirely new firmware with a good backup. Can someone take ownership of this one? Determine if it still exists, and if it does, further bug report it to the openwrt folk at the very least? --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://the-edge.blogspot.com