From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.unina.it (smtp2.unina.it [192.132.34.62]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 883F6201146 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f171.google.com (mail-qy0-f171.google.com [209.85.216.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp2.unina.it (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4VFZnCI032335 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:35:50 +0200 Received: by qyj19 with SMTP id 19so1554746qyj.16 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:35:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.105.14 with SMTP id r14mr4312461qao.81.1306856149324; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.88.66 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:35:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8FBAB478-A012-47BB-A606-EC99715B160C@cc.gatech.edu> References: <5FC6E7BF-B18B-4D41-A80A-84030C79115E@cc.gatech.edu> <4629388C-A50B-44DD-A5D7-57B830E1B30A@cc.gatech.edu> <8FBAB478-A012-47BB-A606-EC99715B160C@cc.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:35:49 +0200 Message-ID: From: Walter de Donato To: Nick Feamster Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5431db88d945d04a49428f1 Cc: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] repo locations + source code license? X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: BISMark related software development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:19:08 -0000 --bcaec5431db88d945d04a49428f1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sold! :-) 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster > Yes. "bismark-firmware" (singular) seems good. > > On May 31, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Walter de Donato wrote: > > > Why don't bismark-firmwares? > > > > Walter > > > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster > > Yes, I think perhaps bismark builds could be kept in a separate repo. > > > > Not sure what we could call that one. bismark-router? > > > > -Nick > > > > On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Walter de Donato wrote: > > > > > I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses. > > > I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL would be more > appropriate. > > > What do you think? > > > > > > I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't start yet doing > it. > > > Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas? > > > > > > Walter > > > > > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster > > > for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source code is > publicly available. > > > > > > "Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e., open source) > and any non-personally identifiable data collected through the software t= ool > must be made available, upon request, to the public for independent > analysis." > > > > > > 1. What license are we going to use? > > > > > > 2. Should we move to github.com today? I am happy to try to migrate > the network dashboard code into there. What about: (1) the BISMark firmw= are > build; (2) BISMark? > > > > > > For the firmware and management software, I'm actually not sure if th= e > repositories are currently public? > > > > > > How should we handle this issue? > > > > > > -Nick > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Bismark-devel mailing list > > > Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Walter de Donato, PhD Student > > > Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica > > > Universit=E0 degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II" > > > Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy) > > > Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816 > > > Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it > > > WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato > > > > > > > > > > > > --bcaec5431db88d945d04a49428f1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sold! :-)


2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.g= atech.edu>
Yes. =A0"bismark-firmware" (singular) seems good.

On May 31, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:

> Why don't bismark-firmwares?
>
> Walter
>
> 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <= feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
> Yes, I think perhaps bismark builds could be kept in a separate repo.<= br> >
> Not sure what we could call that one. =A0bismark-router?
>
> -Nick
>
> On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
>
> > I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses.
> > I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL would be= more appropriate.
> > What do you think?
> >
> > I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't start y= et doing it.
> > Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas?
> >
> > Walter
> >
> > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
> > for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source code is= publicly available.
> >
> > "Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e., open= source) and any non-personally identifiable data collected through the sof= tware tool must be made available, upon request, to the public for independ= ent analysis."
> >
> > 1. What license are we going to use?
> >
> > 2. Should we move to github.com today? =A0I am happy to try to migrate the network dashb= oard code into there. =A0What about: (1) the BISMark firmware build; (2) BI= SMark?
> >
> > For the firmware and management software, I'm actually not su= re if the repositories are currently public?
> >
> > How should we handle this issue?
> >
> > -Nick
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bismark-devel mailing list
> > Bismark-de= vel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel<= br> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Walter de Donato, PhD Student
> > Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
> > Universit=E0 =A0degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
> > Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
> > Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
> > Email: walter.dedonat= o@unina.it
> > WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato
> >
>
>
>




--bcaec5431db88d945d04a49428f1--