I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses.
I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL would be more
appropriate.
What do you think?

I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't start yet doing it.
Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas?

Walter

2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>

> for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source code is publicly
> available.
>
> "Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e., open source) and
> any non-personally identifiable data collected through the software tool
> must be made available, upon request, to the public for independent
> analysis."
>
> 1. What license are we going to use?
>
> 2. Should we move to github.com today?  I am happy to try to migrate the
> network dashboard code into there.  What about: (1) the BISMark firmware
> build; (2) BISMark?
>
> For the firmware and management software, I'm actually not sure if the
> repositories are currently public?
>
> How should we handle this issue?
>
> -Nick
> _______________________________________________
> Bismark-devel mailing list
> Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel
>
>


-- 
Walter de Donato, PhD Student
Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
Università  degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it
WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato