I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses.
I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL would be more appropriate.
What do you think?

I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't start yet doing it.
Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas?

Walter

2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source code is publicly available.

"Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e., open source) and any non-personally identifiable data collected through the software tool must be made available, upon request, to the public for independent analysis."

1. What license are we going to use?

2. Should we move to github.com today?  I am happy to try to migrate the network dashboard code into there.  What about: (1) the BISMark firmware build; (2) BISMark?

For the firmware and management software, I'm actually not sure if the repositories are currently public?

How should we handle this issue?

-Nick
_______________________________________________
Bismark-devel mailing list
Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel




--
Walter de Donato, PhD Student
Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
Università  degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it
WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato