From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
Cc: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] Buffalo WZR-HP-G301NH appears useful
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 11:31:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimciDMsCLAzTCGqOiqhkjWFYKB3=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FFA8F797-3F0A-48D9-8B6E-F037AE24BDD1@cc.gatech.edu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1874 bytes --]
Well, more important to me right now is knowing how many wndr3700v2 routers
we can QA *right now*, and when the next 10 are arriving.
And seriously, everywhere I've been in the 3rd world, 2.4 ghz is HOPELESSly
polluted.
So the wndr3700v2 remains the best in breed for us.
But: sure, firing up a build for the buffalo and testing that in parallel
won't take much time, and I LOVE having multiple vendors for stuff that
could be obsoleted at any second. Netgear's CTO has never got back to me on
assuring supply....
And any time you can cut the BOM in half, is a good time.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>wrote:
> The SamKnows guys also pointed us to this router as a possibility.
>
> Should we get a few to play with here during your visit?
>
> -Nick
>
> On May 4, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> > Although we are having GREAT results with the wndr3700v2 on both the
> bismark and iscwrt projects, word is that the Buffalo WZR-HP-G301NH is the
> same hardware, and comes with 32MB flash/64MB ram, and costs less than 70
> dollars from newegg.
> >
> > I personally happen to be a huge fan of 5.x ghz technology (2.4 ghz is
> hopelessly polluted) but for those out there that don't need 5.Xghz, and
> want to save on costs (the wndr3700v2 is 139 dollars)...
> >
> > AND wants to play with one of these buffalo routers, I'm willing to start
> doing builds for it...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dave Täht
> > SKYPE: davetaht
> > US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
> > http://the-edge.blogspot.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bismark-devel mailing list
> > Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel
>
>
--
Dave Täht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2660 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-04 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-04 17:26 Dave Taht
2011-05-04 17:27 ` Nick Feamster
2011-05-04 17:31 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2011-05-09 19:40 ` Dave Taht
2011-05-09 20:28 ` Nick Feamster
[not found] ` <BANLkTindwwmoBye_=jHva5D==py5bzPjiA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <48079E0D-D4D1-4EEF-9190-C9D342954A96@cc.gatech.edu>
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=-R2kcQkozQ=eJA8tQLTLu8TQg7g@mail.gmail.com>
2011-05-09 21:17 ` Nick Feamster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTimciDMsCLAzTCGqOiqhkjWFYKB3=g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=feamster@cc.gatech.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox