From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iw0-f171.google.com (mail-iw0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCA22201ACD; Wed, 4 May 2011 10:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so1752230iwn.16 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 10:31:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bSNHhV8ZP2bK/cuCPmr4ohkQO49IxipLG3tdUuktnYM=; b=BHHZ2SwndF9IgJUkC9FuqbfKmwxqYDabY79zFKEcHLM4IQbTOWAD55eQCmvjnkK1ZC TXP9AOTED9qmlL1MyBxyLMGrPFi/TGTIzi8p2O4TKZ4nodVq7xSo08sjb+fnWKn/eWJZ hFW0VEdOBzKmYwuqwKTfEAHhSjgB9LQ82trW0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=d08TRcKJeEfHRIQjLEGGjFX8fG3rSduwhDfNZ4zt3lW16wThv7oQ20Iw4HOZirfDoa FbIy6MuFXRbmr8PWSIqxqTol9UITICrPBUr8B/NoZy8oQqyRW8M02zQh4+6lVYkJsOKe gfEE4nNRLqeWwnoH1OkVmcBwSzH8SO7/gnF+4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.205.88 with SMTP id fp24mr444567ibb.21.1304530270190; Wed, 04 May 2011 10:31:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.34.77 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 10:31:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 11:31:10 -0600 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Nick Feamster Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ed1065a7d5704a2769f69 Cc: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] Buffalo WZR-HP-G301NH appears useful X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: BISMark related software development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 17:27:06 -0000 --0016364ed1065a7d5704a2769f69 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, more important to me right now is knowing how many wndr3700v2 routers we can QA *right now*, and when the next 10 are arriving. And seriously, everywhere I've been in the 3rd world, 2.4 ghz is HOPELESSly polluted. So the wndr3700v2 remains the best in breed for us. But: sure, firing up a build for the buffalo and testing that in parallel won't take much time, and I LOVE having multiple vendors for stuff that could be obsoleted at any second. Netgear's CTO has never got back to me on assuring supply.... And any time you can cut the BOM in half, is a good time. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Nick Feamster wrot= e: > The SamKnows guys also pointed us to this router as a possibility. > > Should we get a few to play with here during your visit? > > -Nick > > On May 4, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > Although we are having GREAT results with the wndr3700v2 on both the > bismark and iscwrt projects, word is that the Buffalo WZR-HP-G301NH is th= e > same hardware, and comes with 32MB flash/64MB ram, and costs less than 70 > dollars from newegg. > > > > I personally happen to be a huge fan of 5.x ghz technology (2.4 ghz is > hopelessly polluted) but for those out there that don't need 5.Xghz, and > want to save on costs (the wndr3700v2 is 139 dollars)... > > > > AND wants to play with one of these buffalo routers, I'm willing to sta= rt > doing builds for it... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Dave T=E4ht > > SKYPE: davetaht > > US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 > > http://the-edge.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Bismark-devel mailing list > > Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel > > --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://the-edge.blogspot.com --0016364ed1065a7d5704a2769f69 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, more important to me right now is knowing how many wndr3700v2 routers= we can QA *right now*, and when the next 10 are arriving.

And serio= usly, everywhere I've been in the 3rd world, 2.4 ghz is HOPELESSly poll= uted.

So the wndr3700v2 remains the best in breed for us.

But: sure, f= iring up a build for the buffalo and testing that in parallel won't tak= e much time, and I LOVE having multiple vendors for stuff that could be obs= oleted at any second. Netgear's CTO has never got back to me on assurin= g supply....

And any time you can cut the BOM in half, is a good time.

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech= .edu> wrote:
The SamKnows guys= also pointed us to this router as a possibility.

Should we get a few to play with here during your visit?

-Nick

On May 4, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Dave Taht wrote:

> Although we are having GREAT results with the wndr3700v2 on both the b= ismark and iscwrt projects, word is that the Buffalo WZR-HP-G301NH is the s= ame hardware, and comes with 32MB flash/64MB ram, and costs less than 70 do= llars from newegg.
>
> I personally happen to be a huge fan of 5.x ghz technology (2.4 ghz is= hopelessly polluted) but for those out there that don't need 5.Xghz, a= nd want to save on costs (the wndr3700v2 is 139 dollars)...
>
> AND wants to play with one of these buffalo routers, I'm willing t= o start doing builds for it...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave T=E4ht
> SKYPE: davetaht
> US Tel: 1-239-82= 9-5608
> http://the-= edge.blogspot.com
> _______________________________________________
> Bismark-devel mailing list
> Bismark-devel@l= ists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel




--
Dave T=E4ht
SKYPE: d= avetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com
--0016364ed1065a7d5704a2769f69--