From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iw0-f171.google.com (mail-iw0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DB67201ADB; Wed, 4 May 2011 10:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so1780895iwn.16 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 10:55:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gHMsKaOsHGKFod/elUf9r53n1m2OVHezpiBLorDP6tU=; b=GWx3YSik25NhDkdyD0q2RqbHor7puvwtREkXHsKySgNfqf2jqwBId50x/uT/AAegiy hmHXnthWbn2S3bgGnIMVGTO5rBnfLHK5wS++ylsUFwNUFFDSGhGWHEEKkPMdYI7GnUTC kUfAO4n9EnG0MVGL3cccdC5C8/MsDUZI6ptXs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=iK72oA6MCiXdZA4oYA2MNQMkSaaVsifme5BT8xE2SxJ16oO0TeMqMGQKhcfVWW6QYD 5IiPHv5vqk2M5IF9UsPX8Iwty7a4itdfMoZM2i1Aywj/ikjkjctUjOhL6enEDNahZd7+ IGGkZz2IIlMIwLSbKyphwTJVJR83WKQVojFCk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.117.7 with SMTP id o7mr455449ibq.46.1304531733262; Wed, 04 May 2011 10:55:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.34.77 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 10:55:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 11:55:33 -0600 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=005045015a6b8f33ec04a276f6f3 Subject: [Bismark-devel] merging features from iscwrt into bismark X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: BISMark related software development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 17:51:28 -0000 --005045015a6b8f33ec04a276f6f3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable iscwrt is coming along nicely, and there are a few features in it that migh= t be worth making into bismark's capetown release. Notably it has a real webserver (lighttpd), and python cgi support, as well as a public/private SSID implementation and a decent set of pre-built firewall rules. We have plenty of flash and memory left over with the installed tools and daemons I'm aware of right now. I don't regard iscwrt's core features (bind9 + isc dhcpd) as ready for prim= e time as yet, the core blocker is no web interface on that. It would be nice to get dnssec tested in the field at some point but not as part of the capetown release. Somewhat related to this is the idea of spreading next week's testing acros= s the bloat userbase. I daresay we could pick up 10+ testers if we talk about what we need to the bloat mailing list.... I regard adding the buffalo router to the testing list as a big risk (will it work at all?) that also mitigates another big risk - that the heat management on the existing wndr won't stand up to the rigors of elsewhere - the buffalo should run mildly cooler with only one radio installed (and may have better antennas) thoughts? --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://the-edge.blogspot.com --005045015a6b8f33ec04a276f6f3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable iscwrt is coming along nicely, and there are a few features in it that migh= t be worth making into bismark's capetown release.

Notably it ha= s a real webserver (lighttpd), and python cgi support, as well as a public/= private SSID implementation and a decent set of pre-built firewall rules. W= e have plenty of flash and memory left over with the installed tools and da= emons I'm aware of right now.

I don't regard iscwrt's core features (bind9 + isc dhcpd) as re= ady for prime time as yet, the core blocker is no web interface on that. It= would be nice to get dnssec tested in the field at some point but not as p= art of the capetown release.

Somewhat related to this is the idea of spreading next week's testi= ng across the bloat userbase. I daresay we could pick up 10+ testers if we = talk about what we need to the bloat mailing list....

I regard addin= g the buffalo router to the testing list as a big risk (will it work at all= ?) that also mitigates another big risk - that the heat management on the e= xisting wndr won't stand up to the rigors of elsewhere - the buffalo sh= ould run mildly cooler with only one radio installed (and may have better a= ntennas)

thoughts?

--
Dave T=E4ht
SKYPE: davetahtUS Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com
--005045015a6b8f33ec04a276f6f3--