https://github.com/bismark-devel has two repos now.

To meet requirements of the FCC, would it be sufficient merely to point them at the above url, as we organize and add repositories for bismark-packages, etc?

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Walter de Donato <walter.dedonato@unina.it> wrote:
I think I did it.
Can you please confirm me that everything is ok?

Walter


2011/5/31 Walter de Donato <walter.dedonato@unina.it>
I think so... 
I'm currently setting up everything to start importing the Bismark repository.


2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
Do you have access to the "bismark-devel" user on github?

On May 31, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:

> Sold! :-)
>
>
> 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
> Yes.  "bismark-firmware" (singular) seems good.
>
> On May 31, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
>
> > Why don't bismark-firmwares?
> >
> > Walter
> >
> > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
> > Yes, I think perhaps bismark builds could be kept in a separate repo.
> >
> > Not sure what we could call that one.  bismark-router?
> >
> > -Nick
> >
> > On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
> >
> > > I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses.
> > > I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL would be more appropriate.
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't start yet doing it.
> > > Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas?
> > >
> > > Walter
> > >
> > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
> > > for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source code is publicly available.
> > >
> > > "Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e., open source) and any non-personally identifiable data collected through the software tool must be made available, upon request, to the public for independent analysis."
> > >
> > > 1. What license are we going to use?
> > >
> > > 2. Should we move to github.com today?  I am happy to try to migrate the network dashboard code into there.  What about: (1) the BISMark firmware build; (2) BISMark?
> > >
> > > For the firmware and management software, I'm actually not sure if the repositories are currently public?
> > >
> > > How should we handle this issue?
> > >
> > > -Nick
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bismark-devel mailing list
> > > Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Walter de Donato, PhD Student
> > > Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
> > > Università  degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
> > > Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
> > > Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
> > > Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it
> > > WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>





--
Walter de Donato, PhD Student
Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
Università  degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it
WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato




--
Walter de Donato, PhD Student
Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
Università  degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it
WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato


_______________________________________________
Bismark-devel mailing list
Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel




--
Dave Täht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com