From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 436F8201A9A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 13:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iyi20 with SMTP id 20so6092995iyi.16 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 13:56:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=tN0scx30b+OqOT7ZUf93sKY1eWWgLIvqMIfPGlT8svs=; b=UZDQdhB48gopLS4v+P45nGgARJsb65faAfz+Dafma8k5fbm4mjgd80nulgTjLJv5mg 6VpqAcTuiHbHP1GQoDA8cxY00MXdb0X6zp/l2KsWFmK2OTfZQAMBWwpAYe80jPIFuV56 a2ttrwDdRwQNW/CWhWo6rpneEc5BoIugFZBJs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=UWMB6SqyGM5kNnE9juvW5uv7BryUnmQuCvD5OQUVw55gI0bgnrVgrUx87uZxMr3aWp 0hO9SCH44OeonKpmDhKoox3bYZ68BfvjIr6HmLwdf/bYL6n03/Ae7c9JBjwOlN7wdyif qWSOm3MFux3FBvQsgn5/uW3BSm6cUZawoAyfQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.230.138 with SMTP id jm10mr10317282icb.451.1306875365198; Tue, 31 May 2011 13:56:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.35.140 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 13:56:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5FC6E7BF-B18B-4D41-A80A-84030C79115E@cc.gatech.edu> <4629388C-A50B-44DD-A5D7-57B830E1B30A@cc.gatech.edu> <8FBAB478-A012-47BB-A606-EC99715B160C@cc.gatech.edu> <614A5E13-6E88-4F01-9182-4D45147678C0@cc.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 14:56:05 -0600 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Walter de Donato Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3056418fe88ada04a498a1e2 Cc: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bismark-devel] repo locations + source code license? X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: BISMark related software development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 20:39:15 -0000 --20cf3056418fe88ada04a498a1e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable https://github.com/bismark-devel has two repos now. To meet requirements of the FCC, would it be sufficient merely to point the= m at the above url, as we organize and add repositories for bismark-packages, etc? On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Walter de Donato wrote: > I think I did it. > Can you please confirm me that everything is ok? > > Walter > > > 2011/5/31 Walter de Donato > >> I think so... >> I'm currently setting up everything to start importing the Bismark >> repository. >> >> >> 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster >> >>> Do you have access to the "bismark-devel" user on github? >>> >>> On May 31, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Walter de Donato wrote: >>> >>> > Sold! :-) >>> > >>> > >>> > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster >>> > Yes. "bismark-firmware" (singular) seems good. >>> > >>> > On May 31, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Walter de Donato wrote: >>> > >>> > > Why don't bismark-firmwares? >>> > > >>> > > Walter >>> > > >>> > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster >>> > > Yes, I think perhaps bismark builds could be kept in a separate rep= o. >>> > > >>> > > Not sure what we could call that one. bismark-router? >>> > > >>> > > -Nick >>> > > >>> > > On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Walter de Donato wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses. >>> > > > I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL would be mor= e >>> appropriate. >>> > > > What do you think? >>> > > > >>> > > > I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't start yet >>> doing it. >>> > > > Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas? >>> > > > >>> > > > Walter >>> > > > >>> > > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster >>> > > > for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source code is >>> publicly available. >>> > > > >>> > > > "Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e., open >>> source) and any non-personally identifiable data collected through the >>> software tool must be made available, upon request, to the public for >>> independent analysis." >>> > > > >>> > > > 1. What license are we going to use? >>> > > > >>> > > > 2. Should we move to github.com today? I am happy to try to >>> migrate the network dashboard code into there. What about: (1) the BIS= Mark >>> firmware build; (2) BISMark? >>> > > > >>> > > > For the firmware and management software, I'm actually not sure i= f >>> the repositories are currently public? >>> > > > >>> > > > How should we handle this issue? >>> > > > >>> > > > -Nick >>> > > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > > Bismark-devel mailing list >>> > > > Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > -- >>> > > > Walter de Donato, PhD Student >>> > > > Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica >>> > > > Universit=E0 degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II" >>> > > > Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy) >>> > > > Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816 >>> > > > Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it >>> > > > WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Walter de Donato, PhD Student >> Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica >> Universit=E0 degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II" >> Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy) >> Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816 >> Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it >> WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato >> >> > > > -- > Walter de Donato, PhD Student > Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica > Universit=E0 degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II" > Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy) > Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816 > Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it > WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato > > > _______________________________________________ > Bismark-devel mailing list > Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel > > --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://the-edge.blogspot.com --20cf3056418fe88ada04a498a1e2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable https://github.com/bismark-dev= el has two repos now.

To meet requirements of the FCC, would it = be sufficient merely to point them at the above url, as we organize and add= repositories for bismark-packages, etc?

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Walter de = Donato <wa= lter.dedonato@unina.it> wrote:
I think I did it.
Can you please confirm me that everything is ok?

Walter
<= div class=3D"h5">

2011/5/31 Walter de Don= ato <walter.dedonato@unina.it>
I think so...=A0<= div>I'm currently setting up everything to start importing the Bismark = repository.


2011/5/31 Nick Feamster= <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
Do you have acces= s to the "bismark-devel" user on github?

On May 31, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:

> Sold! :-)
>
>
> 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
> Yes. =A0"bismark-firmware" (singular) seems good.
>
> On May 31, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
>
> > Why don't bismark-firmwares?
> >
> > Walter
> >
> > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
> > Yes, I think perhaps bismark builds could be kept in a separate r= epo.
> >
> > Not sure what we could call that one. =A0bismark-router?
> >
> > -Nick
> >
> > On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
> >
> > > I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses.
> > > I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL wou= ld be more appropriate.
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't st= art yet doing it.
> > > Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas?=
> > >
> > > Walter
> > >
> > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
> > > for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source co= de is publicly available.
> > >
> > > "Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e.,= open source) and any non-personally identifiable data collected through th= e software tool must be made available, upon request, to the public for ind= ependent analysis."
> > >
> > > 1. What license are we going to use?
> > >
> > > 2. Should we move to github.com today? =A0I am happy to try to migrate the network = dashboard code into there. =A0What about: (1) the BISMark firmware build; (= 2) BISMark?
> > >
> > > For the firmware and management software, I'm actually n= ot sure if the repositories are currently public?
> > >
> > > How should we handle this issue?
> > >
> > > -Nick
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bismark-devel mailing list
> > > Bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel=
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Walter de Donato, PhD Student
> > > Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
> > > Universit=E0 =A0degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"= ;
> > > Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
> > > Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 7= 6 83816
> > > Email: walter.dedonato@unina.it
> > > WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>





--
Walter de Donato, PhD Student
Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistem= istica
Universit=E0=A0 degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
= Email: walter= .dedonato@unina.it
WWW: ht= tp://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato




--
Walter de Donato, PhD Student
Dipartimento di Informatica e Sist= emistica
Universit=E0=A0 degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
= Email: walter= .dedonato@unina.it
WWW: ht= tp://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato


_______________________________________________
Bismark-devel mailing list
Bismark-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel




--
Dave T=E4ht
SKYP= E: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com
--20cf3056418fe88ada04a498a1e2--