From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7BAF200648 for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 17:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iyi20 with SMTP id 20so5924049iyi.16 for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 17:19:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6ZZnfjToBGE5fugpxKBiBddaAsZNnQnqE1eZjQ0zVMY=; b=Dho86BzliXwzRuJBeTpgKjKbvxtSh3Ics5N/rNMo6AvoHAl7Bdnh5720co9nju0k+Z LzKQyDaxEtYZeMVBJqiVuhTw1lPyWQAyPgw2ajWlASl3Vf3Tr8Dlen+0KbWKdhfUjpOI MpTSJLJfUE1Q9Z9RqXuN7RvNeVW0D3oSRjkVA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=cQc/MNsE9AssKMx+SYNqBb7zi5l9HU4ZilRRKc/yxt6Kxjgvo+F3gVZ0JnJaECuEXQ n9oRmUXpmNXD7leRInMtHopGvqO5GPSHqfkdWGX/A2icolHLywsg5nPAqqLQAgrNkA30 78MsC8Mr0acCoDEnbMlw/EGZLnDBi7Bd6e4as= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.188.140 with SMTP id da12mr751025ibb.131.1306023592994; Sat, 21 May 2011 17:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.31.201 with HTTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 17:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 18:19:52 -0600 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c925f254271d04a3d2506c Subject: [Bismark-devel] useful, easy to use dns benchmark X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: BISMark related software development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 00:07:42 -0000 --001636c925f254271d04a3d2506c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm Note that it does NOT test your system (e.g wndr) nameserver by default. It is best to add that for comparison, especially if you are testing from a wireless host. It's also quite fun to look at the results in wireshark using filters like Mate, or other analysis tools built into wireshark. http://wiki.wireshark.org/Mate/Tutorial --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://the-edge.blogspot.com --001636c925f254271d04a3d2506c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://www.grc.com/dns/ben= chmark.htm


Note that it does NOT test your sys= tem (e.g wndr) nameserver by default. It is best to add that
for compar= ison, especially if you are testing from a wireless host. It's also qui= te fun
to look at the results in wireshark using filters like Mate, or other analy= sis tools built into wireshark.

http://wiki.wireshark.org/Mate/Tutorial


-- <= br> Dave T=E4ht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com
--001636c925f254271d04a3d2506c--