From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 130F0200627 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 18:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iyi12 with SMTP id 12so3196024iyi.16 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:34:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=84xaYxAvd3GZ3DWdZ5CS0l0yWxIk7ELQUtEZ+K5brvM=; b=YuqWcU2cc52fP/XLfML8eRq5Sv355N49c0tsX2CAcl5KIGM8tg2I18vRz7CXTnMiw3 5dwUMoAnOPhnI0E2pbGMADU2Kbl2pdnpT8IAtc5mvmZlSPMzwjdng15K5C2Xvlcy0zUL 60FfHEcGSqx+XNQu1kmJArV66G1kKtqs9PBUU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.156.68 with SMTP id y4mr2606420icw.174.1310870051424; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:34:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.75.197 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:34:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:34:11 +0000 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e8d52c3084c04a83ab7cf Subject: [Bismark-devel] No rc-1 this weekend X-BeenThere: bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: BISMark related software development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 01:55:36 -0000 --90e6ba6e8d52c3084c04a83ab7cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It is to my deep regret that I do not feel this release is baked enough to call a release candidate. I need to get back home, to my own lab, to take a look at it. The principal problem I'm having is that the GigE wan port appears to be malfunctioning in multiple ways, at GigE speeds. I have been able, under heavy load, to crash the wan port, at gigE speeds, with a variety of tests. However, today's build IS pretty good otherwise, and YOUR APPS BUILT, and WORK! IF, and only IF, your external wan port is 100Mbit, rather than GigE, would I recomend you try this build as your main home router. http://huchra.bufferbloat.net/~cerowrt/cerowrt-wndr3700/ However, *please* feel free to hack on it inside of your own lan. There's lots of cool stuff on it, as noted elsewhere. More news as it happens. Good night, and good luck. --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://the-edge.blogspot.com --90e6ba6e8d52c3084c04a83ab7cf Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It is to my deep regret that I do not feel this release is baked enough to = call a release candidate.

I need to get back home, to my own lab, to= take a look at it. The principal problem I'm having is that the
GigE wan port appears to be malfunctioning in multiple ways, at GigE speeds= .=A0

I have been able, under heavy load, to crash the wan port, at = gigE speeds, with a variety of tests.

However, today's build IS = pretty good otherwise, and YOUR APPS BUILT, and WORK!

IF, and only IF, your external wan port is 100Mbit, rather than GigE, w= ould I recomend you try this build
as your main home router.

http://hu= chra.bufferbloat.net/~cerowrt/cerowrt-wndr3700/

However, *please* feel free to hack on it inside of your own lan. There= 's lots of cool stuff on it,
as noted elsewhere.

More news a= s it happens. Good night, and good luck.


--
Dave T=E4ht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com
--90e6ba6e8d52c3084c04a83ab7cf--