From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <srikanth@gatech.edu>
Received: from mail-33-ewr.dyndns.com (mxout-102-ewr.mailhop.org
	[216.146.33.102])
	by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8AA2E0271
	for <bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scan-32-ewr.mailhop.org (scan-32-ewr.local [10.0.141.238])
	by mail-33-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867636F7EEB
	for <bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:45:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 ()
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS
X-Originating-IP: 130.207.165.163
Received: from deliverator3.gatech.edu (deliverator3.gatech.edu
	[130.207.165.163])
	by mail-33-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498E16F6BBF
	for <bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:45:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from deliverator3.gatech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D0B415560F
	for <bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:45:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail5.gatech.edu (mail5.gatech.edu [130.207.185.165])
	by deliverator3.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A42839C0FB
	for <bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:45:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [143.215.129.202] (galapagos.cc.gt.atl.ga.us [143.215.129.202])
	(Authenticated sender: ssundaresan3)
	by mail5.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FDDB1FFC2
	for <bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:45:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4D7FB356.2000407@gatech.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:43:34 -0400
From: Srikanth Sundaresan <srikanth@gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
References: <87y64gfco1.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org>
In-Reply-To: <87y64gfco1.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts
X-BeenThere: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bismark-users.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bismark-users>,
	<mailto:bismark-users-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/private/bismark-users>
List-Post: <mailto:bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bismark-users-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users>,
	<mailto:bismark-users-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:45:52 -0000

It seems to me that they can coexist; to study the impact of the
changes, we do need to know the existing ground truth, no?

- Srikanth

On 03/15/2011 02:42 PM, Dave Täht wrote:
> 
> 
> I have some conflicts that I would like to clearly resolve as we ramp
> up.
> 
> 1) The bufferbloat project is trying to fix the internet
> 2) you are trying to study the internet as it exists
> 
> While some of the bufferbloat fixes in the pipeline will de-heisenberg your
> measurements, the two ideas do conflict somewhat as does your schedule
> vs ours. 
> 
> The wndr3700, which 6+ people have now, is looking to become a focus of
> our efforts for item 1, and may ultimately become a model for the
> "perfect router". (Although I would bet on the upcoming 32MB flash stuff
> coming out later this year as a better model)
>