From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-11-iad.dyndns.com (mxout-072-iad.mailhop.org [216.146.32.72]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F392E0392 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:33:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scan-11-iad.mailhop.org (scan-11-iad.local [10.150.0.208]) by mail-11-iad.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A84170AC5 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:33:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 () X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 130.207.165.165 Received: from deliverator5.gatech.edu (deliverator5.gatech.edu [130.207.165.165]) by mail-11-iad.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501C7170A9A for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from deliverator5.gatech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id CACEC1800A3 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:33:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail1.gatech.edu (mail1.gatech.edu [130.207.185.161]) by deliverator5.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5E718006E for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:33:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [143.215.129.202] (galapagos.cc.gt.atl.ga.us [143.215.129.202]) (Authenticated sender: ssundaresan3) by mail1.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11C7BC2EDF for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:33:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4D7FBE98.9060309@gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:31:36 -0400 From: Srikanth Sundaresan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <87y64gfco1.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> <4D7FB356.2000407@gatech.edu> <87tyf4fc42.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> <587F76A9-5EED-4D3D-B339-DE3979F50853@cc.gatech.edu> <87pqpsfbql.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org>, <93D811CA-EA9E-4F1F-9157-AD5877AE99F1@cc.gatech.edu> In-Reply-To: <93D811CA-EA9E-4F1F-9157-AD5877AE99F1@cc.gatech.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts X-BeenThere: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:33:51 -0000 Another thing we could do is provide an interface for people to look at plots, rather than provide them with the raw data. We can always provide raw data upon request (after we take a first stab at trying to publish it). On 03/15/2011 03:24 PM, Nick Feamster wrote: > I think that sharing the active measurements could be done without IRB issues, but we should double-check. > > Another issue is that we want to publish on the data before other people. :-) So, perhaps releasing smaller samples early and the full data down the road (once papers get accepted) would be a good compromise? > > -Nick > > On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Poole, Brian wrote: > >> Random follow-on as I've been chatting with Dave a bit in parallel on IRC as well. He mentioned getting a few things up on the shared site would help collaboration. The two biggies being our test script infrastructure and the raw data we collect. >> >> I don't imagine sharing the testing scripts would cause any big issues; it would be mostly just be logistics of getting it up/documented and deciding whether that becomes the authoritative development source. >> >> Sharing the raw data collected stuck out to me as a harder issue. Is that possible with the way previous studies have been run (ie, does the IRB cause headaches here) ? >> >> Brian >> ________________________________________ >> From: bismark-users-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net [bismark-users-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] on behalf of Nick Feamster [feamster@cc.gatech.edu] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:06 PM >> To: Dave Täht >> Cc: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >> Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts >> >> On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Dave Täht wrote: >> >>> >>> One of the things in the upcoming writing queue is a string of articles >>> for the ACM, case studies. Would you be interested in that? >>> >> >> Yes, definitely. >> >> >>> Are there other publication targets? >> >> ACM Internet measurement conference (may deadline) ACM Sigmetrics (nov deadline) and ACM Sigcomm (jan deadline) seem like natural targets, too. >> >> -Nick >> _______________________________________________ >> Bismark-users mailing list >> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users >> _______________________________________________ >> Bismark-users mailing list >> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users > > _______________________________________________ > Bismark-users mailing list > Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users