From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-01-iad.dyndns.com (mxout-012-iad.mailhop.org [216.146.32.12]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02E62E0271 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:09:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scan-02-iad.mailhop.org (scan-02-iad.local [10.150.0.207]) by mail-01-iad.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFC5718D3 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:09:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 () X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 130.207.165.161 Received: from deliverator1.gatech.edu (deliverator1.gatech.edu [130.207.165.161]) by mail-01-iad.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4129D718BD for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805242DEEFE for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:08:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from deliverator1.gatech.edu by deliverator1.gatech.edu with queue id 1189023-7 for bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:08:29 GMT Received: from mail3.gatech.edu (mail3.gatech.edu [130.207.185.163]) by deliverator1.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13F42DEC57; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:08:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.43.49] (unknown [32.161.92.80]) (Authenticated sender: nf21@mail.gatech.edu) by mail3.gatech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7176E14929B; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:08:28 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Nick Feamster In-Reply-To: <4D7FBE98.9060309@gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:08:07 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <53607867-842A-420C-BF1B-25EA8D1D5B80@cc.gatech.edu> References: <87y64gfco1.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> <4D7FB356.2000407@gatech.edu> <87tyf4fc42.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> <587F76A9-5EED-4D3D-B339-DE3979F50853@cc.gatech.edu> <87pqpsfbql.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org>, <93D811CA-EA9E-4F1F-9157-AD5877AE99F1@cc.gatech.edu> <4D7FBE98.9060309@gatech.edu> To: Srikanth Sundaresan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts X-BeenThere: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:09:08 -0000 Great idea. On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Srikanth Sundaresan wrote: > Another thing we could do is provide an interface for people to look = at > plots, rather than provide them with the raw data. We can always = provide > raw data upon request (after we take a first stab at trying to publish = it). >=20 >=20 > On 03/15/2011 03:24 PM, Nick Feamster wrote: >> I think that sharing the active measurements could be done without = IRB issues, but we should double-check. >>=20 >> Another issue is that we want to publish on the data before other = people. :-) So, perhaps releasing smaller samples early and the full = data down the road (once papers get accepted) would be a good = compromise? >>=20 >> -Nick >>=20 >> On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Poole, Brian wrote: >>=20 >>> Random follow-on as I've been chatting with Dave a bit in parallel = on IRC as well. He mentioned getting a few things up on the shared site = would help collaboration. The two biggies being our test script = infrastructure and the raw data we collect. >>>=20 >>> I don't imagine sharing the testing scripts would cause any big = issues; it would be mostly just be logistics of getting it up/documented = and deciding whether that becomes the authoritative development source. >>>=20 >>> Sharing the raw data collected stuck out to me as a harder issue. Is = that possible with the way previous studies have been run (ie, does the = IRB cause headaches here) ? >>>=20 >>> Brian >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: bismark-users-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net = [bismark-users-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] on behalf of Nick Feamster = [feamster@cc.gatech.edu] >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:06 PM >>> To: Dave T=E4ht >>> Cc: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts >>>=20 >>> On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Dave T=E4ht wrote: >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> One of the things in the upcoming writing queue is a string of = articles >>>> for the ACM, case studies. Would you be interested in that? >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Yes, definitely. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> Are there other publication targets? >>>=20 >>> ACM Internet measurement conference (may deadline) ACM Sigmetrics = (nov deadline) and ACM Sigcomm (jan deadline) seem like natural targets, = too. >>>=20 >>> -Nick >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bismark-users mailing list >>> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bismark-users mailing list >>> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Bismark-users mailing list >> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users > _______________________________________________ > Bismark-users mailing list > Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users