Historic archive of defunct list bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: d@taht.net (Dave Täht)
To: Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
Cc: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:02:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pqpsfbql.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <587F76A9-5EED-4D3D-B339-DE3979F50853@cc.gatech.edu> (Nick Feamster's message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:58:27 -0400")


One of the things in the upcoming writing queue is a string of articles
for the ACM, case studies. Would you be interested in that? 

Are there other publication targets?

Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu> writes:

> I think we are both interested in:
>
> - measuring the current state of affairs (as a baseline)
> - designing techniques to try to improve latencies/problems
> - measuring how well respective techniques improve latencies/problems
>
> On Mar 15, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Dave Täht wrote:
>
>> Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu> writes:
>> 
>>> I agree.
>> 
>> To what? :)
>> 
>> Would you consider your existing study "ground truth" and the upcoming
>> one "revealed truth"?
>> 
>> When I talked to de-heisenberging below, the goal would be to eliminate
>> or at least compensate/understand the factors introduced by the
>> measurement box.
>> 
>> Measuring cable modem and DSL latencies/problems and the internet
>> itself, remain a goal, but, for example, the end-user experience of
>> using the box itself with some/much of the new stuff is important to
>> us. 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mar 15, 2011, at 2:43 PM, Srikanth Sundaresan wrote:
>>> 
>>>> It seems to me that they can coexist; to study the impact of the
>>>> changes, we do need to know the existing ground truth, no?
>>>> 
>>>> - Srikanth
>>>> 
>>>> On 03/15/2011 02:42 PM, Dave Täht wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have some conflicts that I would like to clearly resolve as we ramp
>>>>> up.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1) The bufferbloat project is trying to fix the internet
>>>>> 2) you are trying to study the internet as it exists
>>>>> 
>>>>> While some of the bufferbloat fixes in the pipeline will de-heisenberg your
>>>>> measurements, the two ideas do conflict somewhat as does your schedule
>>>>> vs ours. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The wndr3700, which 6+ people have now, is looking to become a focus of
>>>>> our efforts for item 1, and may ultimately become a model for the
>>>>> "perfect router". (Although I would bet on the upcoming 32MB flash stuff
>>>>> coming out later this year as a better model)
>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bismark-users mailing list
>>>> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bismark-users mailing list
>>> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dave Taht
>> http://nex-6.taht.net
>

-- 
Dave Taht
http://nex-6.taht.net

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-15 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-15 18:42 Dave Täht
2011-03-15 18:43 ` Srikanth Sundaresan
2011-03-15 18:47   ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 18:54     ` Dave Täht
2011-03-15 18:58       ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 19:02         ` Dave Täht [this message]
2011-03-15 19:06           ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 19:19             ` Poole, Brian
2011-03-15 19:24               ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 19:31                 ` Srikanth Sundaresan
2011-03-15 20:08                   ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-16  8:37                   ` Walter de Donato
2011-03-15 20:31             ` Dave Täht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pqpsfbql.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org \
    --to=d@taht.net \
    --cc=bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=feamster@cc.gatech.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox