Historic archive of defunct list bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
To: "Poole, Brian" <bpoole@cc.gatech.edu>
Cc: "bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:24:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <93D811CA-EA9E-4F1F-9157-AD5877AE99F1@cc.gatech.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FC2117C703F33143ACE5AAD34CF98FBCAD3DD0@aeatlgtrmbx01.gtri.ext>

I think that sharing the active measurements could be done without IRB issues, but we should double-check.

Another issue is that we want to publish on the data before other people. :-)  So, perhaps releasing smaller samples early and the full data down the road (once papers get accepted) would be a good compromise?

-Nick

On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Poole, Brian wrote:

> Random follow-on as I've been chatting with Dave a bit in parallel on IRC as well. He mentioned getting a few things up on the shared site would help collaboration. The two biggies being our test script infrastructure and the raw data we collect.
> 
> I don't imagine sharing the testing scripts would cause any big issues; it would be mostly just be logistics of getting it up/documented and deciding whether that becomes the authoritative development source.
> 
> Sharing the raw data collected stuck out to me as a harder issue. Is that possible with the way previous studies have been run (ie, does the IRB cause headaches here) ?
> 
> Brian
> ________________________________________
> From: bismark-users-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net [bismark-users-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] on behalf of Nick Feamster [feamster@cc.gatech.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:06 PM
> To: Dave Täht
> Cc: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
> Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts
> 
> On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Dave Täht wrote:
> 
>> 
>> One of the things in the upcoming writing queue is a string of articles
>> for the ACM, case studies. Would you be interested in that?
>> 
> 
> Yes, definitely.
> 
> 
>> Are there other publication targets?
> 
> ACM Internet measurement conference (may deadline) ACM Sigmetrics (nov deadline) and ACM Sigcomm (jan deadline) seem like natural targets, too.
> 
> -Nick
> _______________________________________________
> Bismark-users mailing list
> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users
> _______________________________________________
> Bismark-users mailing list
> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users


  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-15 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-15 18:42 Dave Täht
2011-03-15 18:43 ` Srikanth Sundaresan
2011-03-15 18:47   ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 18:54     ` Dave Täht
2011-03-15 18:58       ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 19:02         ` Dave Täht
2011-03-15 19:06           ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 19:19             ` Poole, Brian
2011-03-15 19:24               ` Nick Feamster [this message]
2011-03-15 19:31                 ` Srikanth Sundaresan
2011-03-15 20:08                   ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-16  8:37                   ` Walter de Donato
2011-03-15 20:31             ` Dave Täht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=93D811CA-EA9E-4F1F-9157-AD5877AE99F1@cc.gatech.edu \
    --to=feamster@cc.gatech.edu \
    --cc=bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=bpoole@cc.gatech.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox