From: Nick Feamster <feamster@cc.gatech.edu>
To: Srikanth Sundaresan <srikanth@gatech.edu>
Cc: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:47:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A5E2325F-2BC0-4EEB-A6D0-2EB41A04C12C@cc.gatech.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D7FB356.2000407@gatech.edu>
I agree.
On Mar 15, 2011, at 2:43 PM, Srikanth Sundaresan wrote:
> It seems to me that they can coexist; to study the impact of the
> changes, we do need to know the existing ground truth, no?
>
> - Srikanth
>
> On 03/15/2011 02:42 PM, Dave Täht wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have some conflicts that I would like to clearly resolve as we ramp
>> up.
>>
>> 1) The bufferbloat project is trying to fix the internet
>> 2) you are trying to study the internet as it exists
>>
>> While some of the bufferbloat fixes in the pipeline will de-heisenberg your
>> measurements, the two ideas do conflict somewhat as does your schedule
>> vs ours.
>>
>> The wndr3700, which 6+ people have now, is looking to become a focus of
>> our efforts for item 1, and may ultimately become a model for the
>> "perfect router". (Although I would bet on the upcoming 32MB flash stuff
>> coming out later this year as a better model)
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Bismark-users mailing list
> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-15 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-15 18:42 Dave Täht
2011-03-15 18:43 ` Srikanth Sundaresan
2011-03-15 18:47 ` Nick Feamster [this message]
2011-03-15 18:54 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-15 18:58 ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 19:02 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-15 19:06 ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 19:19 ` Poole, Brian
2011-03-15 19:24 ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 19:31 ` Srikanth Sundaresan
2011-03-15 20:08 ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-16 8:37 ` Walter de Donato
2011-03-15 20:31 ` Dave Täht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A5E2325F-2BC0-4EEB-A6D0-2EB41A04C12C@cc.gatech.edu \
--to=feamster@cc.gatech.edu \
--cc=bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=srikanth@gatech.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox