I have a web interface already working for my Italian project. You can take a look through the client by selecting "statistiche" from the tray icon menu. Also Tony is doing something similar in the hndr context. -Walter Il giorno 15/mar/2011 20.33, "Srikanth Sundaresan" ha scritto: > Another thing we could do is provide an interface for people to look at > plots, rather than provide them with the raw data. We can always provide > raw data upon request (after we take a first stab at trying to publish it). > > > On 03/15/2011 03:24 PM, Nick Feamster wrote: >> I think that sharing the active measurements could be done without IRB issues, but we should double-check. >> >> Another issue is that we want to publish on the data before other people. :-) So, perhaps releasing smaller samples early and the full data down the road (once papers get accepted) would be a good compromise? >> >> -Nick >> >> On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Poole, Brian wrote: >> >>> Random follow-on as I've been chatting with Dave a bit in parallel on IRC as well. He mentioned getting a few things up on the shared site would help collaboration. The two biggies being our test script infrastructure and the raw data we collect. >>> >>> I don't imagine sharing the testing scripts would cause any big issues; it would be mostly just be logistics of getting it up/documented and deciding whether that becomes the authoritative development source. >>> >>> Sharing the raw data collected stuck out to me as a harder issue. Is that possible with the way previous studies have been run (ie, does the IRB cause headaches here) ? >>> >>> Brian >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: bismark-users-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net [ bismark-users-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] on behalf of Nick Feamster [ feamster@cc.gatech.edu] >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:06 PM >>> To: Dave Täht >>> Cc: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts >>> >>> On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Dave Täht wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> One of the things in the upcoming writing queue is a string of articles >>>> for the ACM, case studies. Would you be interested in that? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, definitely. >>> >>> >>>> Are there other publication targets? >>> >>> ACM Internet measurement conference (may deadline) ACM Sigmetrics (nov deadline) and ACM Sigcomm (jan deadline) seem like natural targets, too. >>> >>> -Nick >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bismark-users mailing list >>> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bismark-users mailing list >>> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bismark-users mailing list >> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users > _______________________________________________ > Bismark-users mailing list > Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users >