Il giorno 15/mar/2011 20.33, "Srikanth Sundaresan" <srikanth@gatech.edu> ha scritto:
> Another thing we could do is provide an interface for people to look at
> plots, rather than provide them with the raw data. We can always provide
> raw data upon request (after we take a first stab at trying to publish it).
>
>
> On 03/15/2011 03:24 PM, Nick Feamster wrote:
>> I think that sharing the active measurements could be done without IRB issues, but we should double-check.
>>
>> Another issue is that we want to publish on the data before other people. :-) So, perhaps releasing smaller samples early and the full data down the road (once papers get accepted) would be a good compromise?
>>
>> -Nick
>>
>> On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Poole, Brian wrote:
>>
>>> Random follow-on as I've been chatting with Dave a bit in parallel on IRC as well. He mentioned getting a few things up on the shared site would help collaboration. The two biggies being our test script infrastructure and the raw data we collect.
>>>
>>> I don't imagine sharing the testing scripts would cause any big issues; it would be mostly just be logistics of getting it up/documented and deciding whether that becomes the authoritative development source.
>>>
>>> Sharing the raw data collected stuck out to me as a harder issue. Is that possible with the way previous studies have been run (ie, does the IRB cause headaches here) ?
>>>
>>> Brian
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: bismark-users-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net [bismark-users-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] on behalf of Nick Feamster [feamster@cc.gatech.edu]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:06 PM
>>> To: Dave Täht
>>> Cc: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts
>>>
>>> On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Dave Täht wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> One of the things in the upcoming writing queue is a string of articles
>>>> for the ACM, case studies. Would you be interested in that?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, definitely.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Are there other publication targets?
>>>
>>> ACM Internet measurement conference (may deadline) ACM Sigmetrics (nov deadline) and ACM Sigcomm (jan deadline) seem like natural targets, too.
>>>
>>> -Nick
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bismark-users mailing list
>>> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bismark-users mailing list
>>> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bismark-users mailing list
>> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users
> _______________________________________________
> Bismark-users mailing list
> Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users
>