From: "Poole, Brian" <bpoole@cc.gatech.edu>
To: "bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:19:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <FC2117C703F33143ACE5AAD34CF98FBCAD3DD0@aeatlgtrmbx01.gtri.ext> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F38D631E-C4B9-4AD4-B0E9-04E82E1B12D5@cc.gatech.edu>
Random follow-on as I've been chatting with Dave a bit in parallel on IRC as well. He mentioned getting a few things up on the shared site would help collaboration. The two biggies being our test script infrastructure and the raw data we collect.
I don't imagine sharing the testing scripts would cause any big issues; it would be mostly just be logistics of getting it up/documented and deciding whether that becomes the authoritative development source.
Sharing the raw data collected stuck out to me as a harder issue. Is that possible with the way previous studies have been run (ie, does the IRB cause headaches here) ?
Brian
________________________________________
From: bismark-users-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net [bismark-users-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] on behalf of Nick Feamster [feamster@cc.gatech.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:06 PM
To: Dave Täht
Cc: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts
On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Dave Täht wrote:
>
> One of the things in the upcoming writing queue is a string of articles
> for the ACM, case studies. Would you be interested in that?
>
Yes, definitely.
> Are there other publication targets?
ACM Internet measurement conference (may deadline) ACM Sigmetrics (nov deadline) and ACM Sigcomm (jan deadline) seem like natural targets, too.
-Nick
_______________________________________________
Bismark-users mailing list
Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-15 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-15 18:42 Dave Täht
2011-03-15 18:43 ` Srikanth Sundaresan
2011-03-15 18:47 ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 18:54 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-15 18:58 ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 19:02 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-15 19:06 ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 19:19 ` Poole, Brian [this message]
2011-03-15 19:24 ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-15 19:31 ` Srikanth Sundaresan
2011-03-15 20:08 ` Nick Feamster
2011-03-16 8:37 ` Walter de Donato
2011-03-15 20:31 ` Dave Täht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=FC2117C703F33143ACE5AAD34CF98FBCAD3DD0@aeatlgtrmbx01.gtri.ext \
--to=bpoole@cc.gatech.edu \
--cc=bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox