From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-22-ewr.dyndns.com (mxout-104-ewr.mailhop.org [216.146.33.104]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2202E0392 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:19:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scan-22-ewr.mailhop.org (scan-22-ewr.local [10.0.141.244]) by mail-22-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFE32FFE8 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:19:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 () X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 130.207.199.162 Received: from relay1.gtri.gatech.edu (relay3.gtri.gatech.edu [130.207.199.162]) by mail-22-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817C82FEF1 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aeatlgtrmfe3.gtri.ext (unknown [130.207.199.225]) by relay1.gtri.gatech.edu (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 72E25A11AEB for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:19:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from aeatlgtrmfe3.gtri.ext ([130.207.199.225]) by relay1.gtri.gatech.edu with ESMTP id elsqd9VV0Mm8T4tB for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:19:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from AEATLGTRMBX01.gtri.ext ([fe80::e559:bd84:4baa:c5d]) by aeatlgtrmfe3.gtri.ext ([2002:82cf:c7e1::82cf:c7e1]) with mapi; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:19:50 -0400 From: "Poole, Brian" To: "bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net" Thread-Topic: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts Thread-Index: AQHL40OPF+lat77UPEuDXopz9/9shZQvBK4A//+900E= Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:19:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87y64gfco1.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> <4D7FB356.2000407@gatech.edu> <87tyf4fc42.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> <587F76A9-5EED-4D3D-B339-DE3979F50853@cc.gatech.edu> <87pqpsfbql.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts X-BeenThere: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:19:57 -0000 Random follow-on as I've been chatting with Dave a bit in parallel on IRC a= s well. He mentioned getting a few things up on the shared site would help = collaboration. The two biggies being our test script infrastructure and the= raw data we collect.=0A= =0A= I don't imagine sharing the testing scripts would cause any big issues; it = would be mostly just be logistics of getting it up/documented and deciding = whether that becomes the authoritative development source.=0A= =0A= Sharing the raw data collected stuck out to me as a harder issue. Is that p= ossible with the way previous studies have been run (ie, does the IRB cause= headaches here) ?=0A= =0A= Brian=0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: bismark-users-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net [bismark-users-bounces@li= sts.bufferbloat.net] on behalf of Nick Feamster [feamster@cc.gatech.edu]=0A= Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:06 PM=0A= To: Dave T=E4ht=0A= Cc: bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net=0A= Subject: Re: [Bismark-users] coping with conflicts=0A= =0A= On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Dave T=E4ht wrote:=0A= =0A= >=0A= > One of the things in the upcoming writing queue is a string of articles= =0A= > for the ACM, case studies. Would you be interested in that?=0A= >=0A= =0A= Yes, definitely.=0A= =0A= =0A= > Are there other publication targets?=0A= =0A= ACM Internet measurement conference (may deadline) ACM Sigmetrics (nov dead= line) and ACM Sigcomm (jan deadline) seem like natural targets, too.=0A= =0A= -Nick=0A= _______________________________________________=0A= Bismark-users mailing list=0A= Bismark-users@lists.bufferbloat.net=0A= https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-users=0A=