* Comparing Linux qdiscs in lab conditions (paper)
@ 2013-01-17 23:50 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2013-01-17 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bloat, bloat-announce, codel, end2end-interest
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 774 bytes --]
Hello
I've recently written and defended this university project report on
bufferbloat as part of my masters programme:
http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/9322 (or
http://akira.ruc.dk/~tohojo/bufferbloat/bufferbloat-final.pdf if the
first link doesn't work).
The paper compares four different Linux qdiscs in a simple lab setup,
and demonstrates bufferbloat, and the mitigation provided by fq_codel,
quite well. The first couple of sections on how TCP and the Linux
network stack work are probably known material to most people here, so
feel free to skip to the experimental setup and results in sections 5
and 6.
I hope you will find this interesting; feel free to comment and/or ask
questions. :)
-Toke
--
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
toke@toke.dk
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 489 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-01-17 23:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-17 23:50 Comparing Linux qdiscs in lab conditions (paper) Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox