RE: [Cerowrt-devel] reproducing network research results with mosh

[dpreed@reed.com]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1721 bytes --]


Just curious... have you run RRUL-style testing of mosh over a congested link?   Not knowing in what way mosh is "UDP-based" I wonder what happens to it when you run a program like, say, "top", over mosh when there is heavy file transfer load.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 9:27am
To: "bloat" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>, "bloat-devel" <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] reproducing network research results with mosh



http://reproducingnetworkresearch.wordpress.com/2013/03/14/mosh-cs244-13/

I embraced mosh wholeheartedly about a year ago. I've been installing
it everywhere I go, with much of the same enthusiasm I had for putting
mosaic on everything back in the early 90s.

As a ssh replacement for interactive traffic, mosh is of tremendous
use, particularly in the case where machines are suspended/resumed,
move access points, or are experiencing wildly variable latency and/or
long RTTs.

It's now available across most unix OSes, and often installable via
the standard package manager.

http://mosh.mit.edu/

Try it!

It would be awesome if this tech could make it into a generation of
command line interfaces for embedded gear like routers and switches.
However at the moment the server code requires C++ and libstd++, which
makes it overlarge for the lowest end of gear.

-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2120 bytes --]