From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp181.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp181.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EFB121F207; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp28.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3364FE0494; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:35:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: from legacy7.wa-web.iad1a (legacy7.wa-web.iad1a.rsapps.net [192.168.2.216]) by smtp28.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1274CE046D; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:35:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from reed.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by legacy7.wa-web.iad1a (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67633200B0; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:35:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: dpreed@reed.com, from: dpreed@reed.com) with HTTP; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:35:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:35:23 -0400 (EDT) Subject: RE: [Cerowrt-devel] reproducing network research results with mosh From: dpreed@reed.com To: "Dave Taht" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_20130322093523000000_21751" Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Type: html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1363959323.942511859@apps.rackspace.com> X-Mailer: webmail7.0 Cc: bloat-devel , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat X-BeenThere: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers working on AQM, device drivers, and networking stacks" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:35:25 -0000 ------=_20130322093523000000_21751 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0AJust curious... have you run RRUL-style testing of mosh over a congested= link? Not knowing in what way mosh is "UDP-based" I wonder what happens = to it when you run a program like, say, "top", over mosh when there is heav= y file transfer load.=0A =0A-----Original Message-----=0AFrom: "Dave Taht" = =0ASent: Friday, March 22, 2013 9:27am=0ATo: "bloat" <= bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>, "bloat-devel" , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net=0ASubject: [Cerowrt-devel] reprod= ucing network research results with mosh=0A=0A=0A=0Ahttp://reproducingnetwo= rkresearch.wordpress.com/2013/03/14/mosh-cs244-13/=0A=0AI embraced mosh who= leheartedly about a year ago. I've been installing=0Ait everywhere I go, wi= th much of the same enthusiasm I had for putting=0Amosaic on everything bac= k in the early 90s.=0A=0AAs a ssh replacement for interactive traffic, mosh= is of tremendous=0Ause, particularly in the case where machines are suspen= ded/resumed,=0Amove access points, or are experiencing wildly variable late= ncy and/or=0Along RTTs.=0A=0AIt's now available across most unix OSes, and = often installable via=0Athe standard package manager.=0A=0Ahttp://mosh.mit.= edu/=0A=0ATry it!=0A=0AIt would be awesome if this tech could make it into = a generation of=0Acommand line interfaces for embedded gear like routers an= d switches.=0AHowever at the moment the server code requires C++ and libstd= ++, which=0Amakes it overlarge for the lowest end of gear.=0A=0A-- =0ADave = T=C3=A4ht=0A=0AFixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cer= owrt/subscribe.html=0A_______________________________________________=0ACer= owrt-devel mailing list=0ACerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net=0Ahttps://lis= ts.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel ------=_20130322093523000000_21751 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= Just curious... have you run RRUL-style testing of mosh over a congested li= nk?   Not knowing in what way mosh is "UDP-based" I wonder what h= appens to it when you run a program like, say, "top", over mosh when there = is heavy file transfer load.

=0A

 <= /p>=0A

-----Original Message-----
From= : "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013= 9:27am
To: "bloat" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>, "bloat-devel"= <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat= .net
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] reproducing network research results wit= h mosh

=0A
=0A

http://reproducingnetworkresearch.wordpress.com/2013/03/= 14/mosh-cs244-13/

I embraced mosh wholeheartedly about a year ag= o. I've been installing
it everywhere I go, with much of the same enth= usiasm I had for putting
mosaic on everything back in the early 90s.
As a ssh replacement for interactive traffic, mosh is of tremendo= us
use, particularly in the case where machines are suspended/resumed,=
move access points, or are experiencing wildly variable latency and/o= r
long RTTs.

It's now available across most unix OSes, and = often installable via
the standard package manager.

http://= mosh.mit.edu/

Try it!

It would be awesome if this tec= h could make it into a generation of
command line interfaces for embed= ded gear like routers and switches.
However at the moment the server c= ode requires C++ and libstd++, which
makes it overlarge for the lowest= end of gear.

--
Dave T=C3=A4ht

Fixing bufferbl= oat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
_____= __________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list<= br />Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net= /listinfo/cerowrt-devel

=0A
 ------=_20130322093523000000_21751--