Historic archive of defunct list bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>,
	Javier Cardona <javier@cozybit.com>,
	bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	Dave Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] mac80211: implement eBDP algorithm to fight bufferbloat
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:15:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110221191510.GG9650@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D628EDE.1010102@freedesktop.org>

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:12:14AM -0500, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 10:28 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:

> >However, Nathaniel is right -- if the skb is freed right away during
> >tx() you kinda estimate its queue time to be virtually zero. That
> >doesn't make a lot of sense and might in certain conditions exacerbate
> >the problem, for example if the system is out of memory more packets
> >might be allowed through than in normal operation etc.

For those only reading the bloat lists, I replied elsewhere to clarify
that the present patch is only calculating max_enqueued for frames
that result in a tx status report (i.e. not for dropped frames) --
just in case that detail is somehow relevant...

> >Also, for some USB drivers I believe SKB lifetime has no relation to
> >queue size at all because the data is just shuffled into an URB. I'm not
> >sure we can solve this generically. I'm not really sure how this works
> >for USB drivers, I think they queue up frames with the HCI controller
> >rather than directly with the device.
> 
> Let me give a concrete example:
> 
> I checked with Javier Cardona about the Marvell module (libertas
> driver) used on OLPC a couple months ago.
> 
> It turns out there are 4 packets of buffering out in the wireless
> module itself (clearly needed for autonomous forwarding).
> 
> There is also one packet buffer in the device driver itself; Dave
> Woodhouse says it simplified the driver greatly.
> 
> I don't know if anyone has been thinking about how to manage the
> buffering from top to bottom, with devices that may do internal
> buffering in various places.

(FWIW, my current patch won't affect the libertas driver...)

The role I see my patch playing is to evaluate how good a job the
driver/device is doing with it's own buffers.  If it is keeping its
latency low, then I will allow it more fragments to buffer.  If its
latency grows too large, I throttle the number of fragments I allow
the driver to see.  To a large degree, it doesn't matter how much
buffering the driver/device is doing so long as it is moving the
frames along quickly.

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-21 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1297619803-2832-1-git-send-email-njs@pobox.com>
2011-02-17  1:49 ` [RFC] " John W. Linville
2011-02-17  3:31   ` Ben Greear
2011-02-17  4:26   ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-17  8:31   ` Johannes Berg
2011-02-18 21:21   ` [RFC v2] " John W. Linville
2011-02-19  3:44     ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-21 18:47       ` John W. Linville
2011-02-21 23:26         ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-23 22:28           ` John W. Linville
2011-02-25 18:21             ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-25 18:27               ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-20  0:37     ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-20  0:51       ` Jim Gettys
2011-02-20 15:24         ` Dave Täht
2011-02-21 18:52       ` John W. Linville
2011-02-21 15:28     ` Johannes Berg
2011-02-21 16:12       ` Jim Gettys
2011-02-21 19:15         ` John W. Linville [this message]
2011-02-21 19:06       ` John W. Linville
2011-02-21 19:29         ` [RFC v2] mac80211: implement eBDP algorithm to fight bufferbloat - AQM on hosts Jim Gettys
2011-02-21 20:26         ` [RFC v2] mac80211: implement eBDP algorithm to fight bufferbloat Tianji Li
2011-02-28 13:07         ` Johannes Berg
     [not found] <x1-oTZGm1A7eclvABnv1aK0z1Nc7iI@gwene.org>
2011-02-20  1:59 ` Dave Täht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110221191510.GG9650@tuxdriver.com \
    --to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=javier@cozybit.com \
    --cc=jg@freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox