From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>,
Javier Cardona <javier@cozybit.com>,
bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
Dave Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] mac80211: implement eBDP algorithm to fight bufferbloat
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:15:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110221191510.GG9650@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D628EDE.1010102@freedesktop.org>
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:12:14AM -0500, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 10:28 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >However, Nathaniel is right -- if the skb is freed right away during
> >tx() you kinda estimate its queue time to be virtually zero. That
> >doesn't make a lot of sense and might in certain conditions exacerbate
> >the problem, for example if the system is out of memory more packets
> >might be allowed through than in normal operation etc.
For those only reading the bloat lists, I replied elsewhere to clarify
that the present patch is only calculating max_enqueued for frames
that result in a tx status report (i.e. not for dropped frames) --
just in case that detail is somehow relevant...
> >Also, for some USB drivers I believe SKB lifetime has no relation to
> >queue size at all because the data is just shuffled into an URB. I'm not
> >sure we can solve this generically. I'm not really sure how this works
> >for USB drivers, I think they queue up frames with the HCI controller
> >rather than directly with the device.
>
> Let me give a concrete example:
>
> I checked with Javier Cardona about the Marvell module (libertas
> driver) used on OLPC a couple months ago.
>
> It turns out there are 4 packets of buffering out in the wireless
> module itself (clearly needed for autonomous forwarding).
>
> There is also one packet buffer in the device driver itself; Dave
> Woodhouse says it simplified the driver greatly.
>
> I don't know if anyone has been thinking about how to manage the
> buffering from top to bottom, with devices that may do internal
> buffering in various places.
(FWIW, my current patch won't affect the libertas driver...)
The role I see my patch playing is to evaluate how good a job the
driver/device is doing with it's own buffers. If it is keeping its
latency low, then I will allow it more fragments to buffer. If its
latency grows too large, I throttle the number of fragments I allow
the driver to see. To a large degree, it doesn't matter how much
buffering the driver/device is doing so long as it is moving the
frames along quickly.
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-21 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1297619803-2832-1-git-send-email-njs@pobox.com>
2011-02-17 1:49 ` [RFC] " John W. Linville
2011-02-17 3:31 ` Ben Greear
2011-02-17 4:26 ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-17 8:31 ` Johannes Berg
2011-02-18 21:21 ` [RFC v2] " John W. Linville
2011-02-19 3:44 ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-21 18:47 ` John W. Linville
2011-02-21 23:26 ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-23 22:28 ` John W. Linville
2011-02-25 18:21 ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-25 18:27 ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-20 0:37 ` Nathaniel Smith
2011-02-20 0:51 ` Jim Gettys
2011-02-20 15:24 ` Dave Täht
2011-02-21 18:52 ` John W. Linville
2011-02-21 15:28 ` Johannes Berg
2011-02-21 16:12 ` Jim Gettys
2011-02-21 19:15 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2011-02-21 19:06 ` John W. Linville
2011-02-21 19:29 ` [RFC v2] mac80211: implement eBDP algorithm to fight bufferbloat - AQM on hosts Jim Gettys
2011-02-21 20:26 ` [RFC v2] mac80211: implement eBDP algorithm to fight bufferbloat Tianji Li
2011-02-28 13:07 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] <x1-oTZGm1A7eclvABnv1aK0z1Nc7iI@gwene.org>
2011-02-20 1:59 ` Dave Täht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110221191510.GG9650@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=javier@cozybit.com \
--cc=jg@freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox