From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-32-ewr.dyndns.com (mxout-182-ewr.mailhop.org [216.146.33.182]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA65A2E0134 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:45:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from scan-32-ewr.mailhop.org (scan-32-ewr.local [10.0.141.238]) by mail-32-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9956FC6CD for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:45:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 () X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 70.61.120.58 Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by mail-32-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7577D6FC500; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from uucp by smtp.tuxdriver.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PszrK-0003Wr-SF; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:45:34 -0500 Received: from linville-8530p.local (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by linville-8530p.local (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1PFecnb017824; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:40:38 -0500 Received: (from linville@localhost) by linville-8530p.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p1PFea4J017816; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:40:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:40:36 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Dave =?iso-8859-1?Q?T=E4ht?= Subject: Re: [Bloat] Please enter issues into the issue tracker - Issue system organisation needed. Message-ID: <20110225154036.GB15897@tuxdriver.com> References: <4D6668F4.5010705@freedesktop.org> <4D668827.8060508@freedesktop.org> <1298567313.2814.7.camel@edumazet-laptop> <87sjvds2r7.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87sjvds2r7.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Van Jacobson , bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, Eric Dumazet , bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-BeenThere: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers working on AQM, device drivers, and networking stacks" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:46:00 -0000 On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:31:40AM -0700, Dave Täht wrote: > Eric Dumazet writes: > > > Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 11:32 -0500, Jim Gettys a écrit : > > > >> So we need better AQM algorithms and extensive testing: as you may have > >> seen, SFB just went into the Linux mainline this morning. > >> > > > > Indeed ;) > > I would really like a sane implementation of some basic tc scripts for > SFB and CHOKe to be out there. > > Dan Siemon's recent set of bufferbloat-related tests > > http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2011/02/21/network-latency-experiments/ > > appeared to invoke issues between multiple queuing disciplines when > using SFB. > > Now that SFB is kernel bound, and CHOKe as well, I've merged up > support for CHOKe and SFB into this git repo for iproute2 and the tc > traffic control tool. > > See: > > https://github.com/dtaht/iproute2bufferbloat > > There is a debloat-testing Linux kernel repo up at: > > http://git.infradead.org/debloat-testing.git > > It builds, I haven't booted into it yet. The patch set is pretty minor, > if you already have a Linux-2.6 tree it pays to use: > > git clone --references your_existing_tree git://git.infradead.org/debloat-testing.git > > (Doesn't have SFB yet, either. John?) There now, along with a revision of my eBDP patch. The SFQ patches Eric identified later in this thread were already there from 2.6.38-rc6. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.