Historic archive of defunct list bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Raymond <esr@snark.thyrsus.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org>,
	bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Revised results on time-service accuracy
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 04:44:50 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110922084450.B27D620C341@snark.thyrsus.com> (raw)

In previous email, I wrote:

>Over runs of 20-100 fixes, S-T (the clock-skew figure) ranges from 66
>to 76 milliseconds.  Total latency R-T is steady at about 0.38
>seconds.  R-S vanishes - it's close to 0.9 milliseconds.  Total fix
>latency is completely dominated by E-S, the time for gpsd to receive
>and process the fix data from the GPS.  And I'm not seeing a lot of
>bursty variation in these measurements.

I've since fixed a minor misunderstanding between my profiler and gnuplot.
As previously promised, I can now separate RS232 transmission time from
gpsd's analysis time.

For the bufferbloat project's purposes, the important news is that reanalysis
has confirmed the relatively small (~70msec) skew between GPS time and the
NTP-corrected system clock.  I'm also still not seeing chaotic variation.

In other news: At 9600bps, total fix latency is a little higher than I
previously thought (about 0.40sec) and RS232 I/O time does not swamp
analysis time as completely as I expected.  However, doubling RS232
speed to 19200 cuts typical total latency to about 0.28 sec.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>

Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no
rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.
        -- Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491

                 reply	other threads:[~2011-09-22  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110922084450.B27D620C341@snark.thyrsus.com \
    --to=esr@snark.thyrsus.com \
    --cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=jg@freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox