From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34C97201055;
	Mon,  7 Nov 2011 11:32:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uucp by smtp.tuxdriver.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <linville@tuxdriver.com>)
	id 1RNUtV-0001yJ-5q; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:30:09 -0500
Received: from linville-8530p.local (linville-8530p.local [127.0.0.1])
	by linville-8530p.local (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA7JPI1u018552;
	Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:25:18 -0500
Received: (from linville@localhost)
	by linville-8530p.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pA7JPIgU018550;
	Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:25:18 -0500
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:25:17 -0500
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: what I think is wrong with eBDP in debloat-testing
Message-ID: <20111107192517.GH2798@tuxdriver.com>
References: <CAA93jw4+mtDQgRpVD-082Xs0gTWobTg8ZLPBBNa7yUUzJJ-fHg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4+mtDQgRpVD-082Xs0gTWobTg8ZLPBBNa7yUUzJJ-fHg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: bloat-devel <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
X-BeenThere: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developers working on AQM, device drivers,
	and networking stacks" <bloat-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat-devel>,
	<mailto:bloat-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat-devel>,
	<mailto:bloat-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:32:15 -0000

On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 08:10:57PM +0100, Dave Taht wrote:

> John was right when he wrote in the initial announcement:
> 
> "This version runs separate instances of the algorithm for each WMM
> queue -- I reckon that makes sense. "
> 
> and it doesn't.
> 
> "I still ignore HT aggregation, as I'm pretty sure I don't understand
> how it really effects the issue."
> 
> Messes it up completely.

So, can I drop that patch from debloat-testing now?  :-)

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.