Historic archive of defunct list bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Pedro Tumusok <pedro.tumusok@gmail.com>
Cc: Bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Progress with latency-under-load tool
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:42:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4671C30E-2AAA-4250-8ACB-AE9EF2399988@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=20qzZQ866G4h0iCiReUmsk5cA5ObNuY+BsUQx@mail.gmail.com>


On 20 Mar, 2011, at 4:33 pm, Pedro Tumusok wrote:

>> Horrible, isn't it?  I deliberately left these machines with standard configurations in order to show that.
>> 
> Is there any point in running this on a CPE? Or would it be better to
> have it for host to host connections?

Some CPE is multifunctional, eg. fileserver, webcache...  for those types it is definitely worthwhile.

Otherwise, the CPE is just another component of the network between two hosts, but an important one because it often controls the bottleneck (in at least the upload direction).  You culd therefore productively modify the CPE's device drivers or network stack, and then retest it using ordinary hosts.

 - Jonathan


  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-20 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <0D59AD34-AA64-4376-BB8E-58C5D378F488@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <4D829B58.1070601@swin.edu.au>
2011-03-20 10:45   ` Jonathan Morton
     [not found]     ` <AANLkTin1UwEqDiBHvWQ7xi4jP0O4ifhsoBWnWJjE7Byv@mail.gmail.com>
2011-03-20 14:33       ` Fwd: " Pedro Tumusok
2011-03-20 14:42         ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2011-03-20 20:33     ` grenville armitage
2011-03-20 20:53       ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 21:52       ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-20 22:32         ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 22:47           ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 22:52             ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-20 22:55               ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 23:42               ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 21:50     ` Some results of the latency under load tool Dave Täht
2011-03-20 22:24       ` Jonathan Morton
     [not found]     ` <m3d3llgln8.fsf@yahoo.com>
2011-03-21  6:43       ` [Bloat] Progress with latency-under-load tool Jonathan Morton
2011-03-23 10:33     ` Otto Solares Cabrera
2011-03-23 11:26       ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-23 19:27         ` Otto Solares
2011-03-23 20:40           ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-23 22:32             ` Dave Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4671C30E-2AAA-4250-8ACB-AE9EF2399988@gmail.com \
    --to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=Bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=pedro.tumusok@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox