From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from g1t0028.austin.hp.com (g1t0028.austin.hp.com [15.216.28.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp1.hp.com", Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 Secure Server CA - G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4DB32008D9; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from g1t0038.austin.hp.com (g1t0038.austin.hp.com [16.236.32.44]) by g1t0028.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDCF1C0DA; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [16.89.244.213] (tardy.cup.hp.com [16.89.244.213]) by g1t0038.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B7230488; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E2226B3.3070907@hp.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 17:02:59 -0700 From: Rick Jones User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: davehart_gmail_exchange_tee@davehart.net Subject: Re: smoketest #6 of cerowrt is go for testing References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bloat-devel , bismark-bootcamp@projectbismark.net, bismark-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-BeenThere: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers working on AQM, device drivers, and networking stacks" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 23:24:27 -0000 > > ntpd doesn't request dnssec verification -- it simply uses the > provided getaddrinfo(). Any tweaking of the resolver to avoid > requiring DNSSEC validation of queries will be outside the ntpd source > code. > If you configure ntpd with bare IP addresses rather than names, will the getaddrinfo() return without attempting any DNS in the first place? rick jones