From: Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: bloat-devel <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>,
Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>,
boutier@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr, homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] Source-specific routes in Linux [was: atomic updates...]
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 14:54:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <518A4B04.4030702@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4731AFEA-6D92-4201-BEA5-46B535C84657@employees.org>
On 08.05.2013 12:58, Ole Troan wrote:
> at least we're on the same track (and I think the correct one). ;-)
>
> on the border router this is quite simple. if a border router uses PD and it discovers a default router on the same interface,
> that will result in a SADR route (S, D) -> interface, next-hop. where S is PD prefix, D is ::/0, interface is the interface the PD was received
> on and next-hop is whatever router discovery came back with.
>
> the issue is with internal routers, where you may have an internal router connected to two exits on the same link, or behind another
> IR that is connected to both..., i.e. arbitrary topology.
OK, thanks again for the explanation. I think I will add an additional
routing-table-ID parameter to the network daemon. This way any routing
daemon that is going to be properly integrated into OpenWrt can select a
target table for each route, prefix, etc.
Cheers,
Steven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-08 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-05 21:38 Dave Taht
2013-05-05 22:23 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <loom.20130507T130051-512@post.gmane.org>
[not found] ` <87vc6vgghx.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
[not found] ` <8F7177E4-6212-4A74-8A7C-A2D1703A59BF@iki.fi>
[not found] ` <87sj1zgfot.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
2013-05-08 8:51 ` [homenet] " Dave Taht
2013-05-08 9:48 ` Steven Barth
2013-05-08 10:28 ` Ole Troan
2013-05-08 10:51 ` Steven Barth
2013-05-08 10:58 ` Ole Troan
2013-05-08 12:54 ` Steven Barth [this message]
2013-05-08 11:06 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2013-05-08 22:46 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=518A4B04.4030702@openwrt.org \
--to=cyrus@openwrt.org \
--cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=boutier@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr \
--cc=homenet@ietf.org \
--cc=jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr \
--cc=markus.stenberg@iki.fi \
--cc=otroan@employees.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox