Historic archive of defunct list bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: netperf-dev@netperf.org, bloat-devel <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: Linux SCTP: what kind of performance should I expect from netperf?
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:49:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53286AF2.3010203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140318161658.619158b9@redhat.com>

On 03/18/2014 04:16 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Can you give some input on this thread?
>
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:53:40 -0400 Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I was curious about sctp's performance characteristics on
>> AQM'd systems... so
>> I built netperf with sctp support, and ran a couple tests on
>> kernel 3.11...
>>
>> +1: SCTP appears to work over IPv6
>> -1: Throughput is terrible

Yes, performance sucks so far (it's a known problem) and
we need to work on it ... ;-)

I presume one reason here could be as well that you need to
do crc32c checksumming on software (what does perf say?).

>> d@nuc:~/git/netperf$ netperf -6 -H snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net -t
>> SCTP_STREAM_MANY
>> SCTP 1-TO-MANY STREAM TEST from ::0 (::) port 0 AF_INET6 to
>> snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net () port 0 AF_INET6 : demo
>> Recv   Send    Send
>> Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
>> Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
>> bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec
>>
>> 212992 212992   4096    10.00       0.31
>> d@nuc:~/git/netperf$ netperf -6 -H snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net -t TCP_MAERTS
>> MIGRATED TCP MAERTS TEST from ::0 (::) port 0 AF_INET6 to
>> snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net () port 0 AF_INET6 : demo
>> Recv   Send    Send
>> Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
>> Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
>> bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec
>>
>>   87380  16384  16384    10.00       7.65

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-18 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-18 14:53 Dave Taht
2014-03-18 15:16 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-03-18 15:49   ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2014-03-18 16:03     ` Dave Taht
2014-04-16  1:23       ` Dave Taht
2014-04-16  7:33         ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-16 15:30           ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53286AF2.3010203@redhat.com \
    --to=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=netperf-dev@netperf.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox