From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dborkman@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E8C21F1CA
	for <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s3G7XH6R006381
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256
	verify=OK); Wed, 16 Apr 2014 03:33:17 -0400
Received: from [10.36.7.44] (vpn1-7-44.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.7.44])
	by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP
	id s3G7XEl8024436
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 03:33:16 -0400
Message-ID: <534E323A.2080102@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:33:14 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux SCTP: what kind of performance should I expect from netperf?
References: <CAA93jw4-c7ARyqCO_46DJi64-4gjZH8CT-bDNo8OrMXnM3Crtg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140318161658.619158b9@redhat.com> <53286AF2.3010203@redhat.com>
	<CAA93jw5tYv1OJbibxRrytABaoZXbu_d0+1pTWV7Geaotf6mFxg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw7+=ULTsxjz+sHAxevwV9diKQbz7bdPH0BAnK1z4h7KgA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7+=ULTsxjz+sHAxevwV9diKQbz7bdPH0BAnK1z4h7KgA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24
Cc: bloat-devel <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
X-BeenThere: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developers working on AQM, device drivers,
	and networking stacks" <bloat-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat-devel>,
	<mailto:bloat-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat-devel>,
	<mailto:bloat-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 07:33:21 -0000

On 04/16/2014 03:23 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
...
> It appears I despaired of SCTP's performance too early,
> according to this commit, it just got vastly improved:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=362d52040c71f6e8d8158be48c812d7729cb8df1
>
> way to go daniel!
>
> Have to write some tests for it now!

Ok, thanks. That commit needs to be reworked in a different way
by the original authors or us so that it won't hurt performance.
The idea from the original commit is good, but the overall
implementation is not yet fully there it seems.

> I do wish someone could get the ledbat linux kernel module up to parity with
> at least the osx implementation and get it mainlined.
>
> https://github.com/silviov/TCP-LEDBAT

Sounds interesting!