From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDE662009BA
	for <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydrogene.pps.jussieu.fr (hydrogene.pps.jussieu.fr
	[134.157.168.1])
	by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id p6RIuWi9041660
	; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:56:46 +0200 (CEST)
X-Ids: 168
Received: from lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr (lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr
	[134.157.168.57])
	by hydrogene.pps.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28C26C3348;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:57:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jch by lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>)
	id 1Qm9I3-0000rw-0C; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:57:07 +0200
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: some (less than funny) interactions with networking on openwrt
	(and other systems)
References: <CAA93jw6Dkfv9h_pOE5VwT0K8KjjMW9vNmPbTN8NJ+aeJJgjjWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<7ilivj7mla.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
	<CAA93jw5s6_8uhR9t7N+XcWhQKbp9GjNJS7wYL5dt-xj0Wm85ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:57:06 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5s6_8uhR9t7N+XcWhQKbp9GjNJS7wYL5dt-xj0Wm85ww@mail.gmail.com>
	(Dave Taht's message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:36:50 -0600")
Message-ID: <7itya7eem5.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4E305F84.001 by Joe's j-chkmail
	(http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4E305F84.001/134.157.168.1/hydrogene.pps.jussieu.fr/hydrogene.pps.jussieu.fr/<jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
Cc: bismark-devel@projectbismark.net,
	bloat-devel <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	Srikanth Sundaresan <srikanth@gatech.edu>
X-BeenThere: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developers working on AQM, device drivers,
	and networking stacks" <bloat-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat-devel>,
	<mailto:bloat-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat-devel>,
	<mailto:bloat-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:14:02 -0000

>> > 2) qos-scripts (already mentioned) as an additional problem of always
>> > ending up with 127 buckets or so for packets in the SFQ qdisc, when a
>> > 'righter' number would be closer to 8-32.
>>
>> Huh?
>>
>
> Tc reports 127 for SFQ with the default qdisc

I mean -- having fewer buckets than that doesn't make any sense to me,
since you're going to have massive hash collisions.

-- Juliusz