From: d@taht.net (Dave Täht)
To: bloat-devel <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: ECN + pfifo_fast borked?
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:37:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8739mogrgs.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300213714.2927.37.camel@edumazet-laptop> (Eric Dumazet's message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:28:34 +0100")
Note: this is a forward of an existing conversation on netdev about how
to prioritize ECN enabled packets better, in light of dan siemon's
discovery that ECN + pfifo_fast was somewhat borked, over the weekend.
There's a very simple patch for pfifo_fast also being evaluated.
For reference to the problem being addressed, see:
http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2011/03/13/pfifo_fast-and-ecn/
And the thread on netdev...
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> writes:
> Le mardi 15 mars 2011 à 19:09 +0200, Jonathan Morton a écrit :
>> On 15 Mar, 2011, at 8:15 am, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>> > band 0 : high priority packets (like now)
>> > band 1 : (old band 1, ECN capable flows)
>> > band 2 : (old band 1, no ECN flows)
>> > band 3 : low priority packets (old band 2)
>>
>> This seems good to me. It would provide a concrete (if minor) enticement to turn ECN on.
>>
>>
>
> Here is a patch to implement that, on top of net-next-2.6 git tree
>
> qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth1 root refcnt 2 bands 4 priomap 2 1 3 3 2 3 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
> Sent 168 bytes 2 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> index c84b659..95ddf54 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> @@ -412,19 +412,39 @@ static struct Qdisc noqueue_qdisc = {
> };
>
>
> -static const u8 prio2band[TC_PRIO_MAX + 1] = {
> - 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 0, 0 , 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
> +/* 4-band FIFO queue: old style, but should be a bit faster than
> + generic prio+fifo combination.
> + */
> +
> +enum {
> + BAND_HIGH_PRIO,
> + BAND_MEDIUM_ECN_PRIO,
> + BAND_MEDIUM_PRIO,
> + BAND_LOW_PRIO,
> +
> + PFIFO_FAST_BANDS
> };
>
> -/* 3-band FIFO queue: old style, but should be a bit faster than
> - generic prio+fifo combination.
> +/*
> + * We give a litle incent to ECN flows
> */
> +static const u8 prio2band[TC_PRIO_MAX + 1] = {
> + [TC_PRIO_BESTEFFORT] = BAND_MEDIUM_PRIO,
> + [TC_PRIO_FILLER] = BAND_MEDIUM_ECN_PRIO,
> + [TC_PRIO_BULK] = BAND_LOW_PRIO,
> + [TC_PRIO_BULK + 1] = BAND_LOW_PRIO,
> + [TC_PRIO_INTERACTIVE_BULK] = BAND_MEDIUM_PRIO,
> + [TC_PRIO_INTERACTIVE_BULK + 1] = BAND_LOW_PRIO,
> + [TC_PRIO_INTERACTIVE] = BAND_HIGH_PRIO,
> + [TC_PRIO_CONTROL] = BAND_HIGH_PRIO,
> +
> + [TC_PRIO_CONTROL+1 ... TC_PRIO_MAX] = BAND_MEDIUM_PRIO,
> +};
>
> -#define PFIFO_FAST_BANDS 3
>
> /*
> * Private data for a pfifo_fast scheduler containing:
> - * - queues for the three band
> + * - queues for the four bands
> * - bitmap indicating which of the bands contain skbs
> */
> struct pfifo_fast_priv {
> @@ -436,9 +456,13 @@ struct pfifo_fast_priv {
> * Convert a bitmap to the first band number where an skb is queued, where:
> * bitmap=0 means there are no skbs on any band.
> * bitmap=1 means there is an skb on band 0.
> - * bitmap=7 means there are skbs on all 3 bands, etc.
> + * bitmap=2 means there is an skb on band 1.
> + * bitmap=15 means there are skbs on all 4 bands.
> */
> -static const int bitmap2band[] = {-1, 0, 1, 0, 2, 0, 1, 0};
> +static const int bitmap2band[1 << PFIFO_FAST_BANDS] = {
> + -1, 0, 1, 0, 2, 0, 1, 0,
> + 3, 0, 1, 0, 2, 0, 1, 0
> +};
>
> static inline struct sk_buff_head *band2list(struct pfifo_fast_priv *priv,
> int band)
>
>
--
Dave Taht
http://nex-6.taht.net
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-15 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-14 19:26 shaper team forming up Dave Täht
2011-03-14 19:55 ` [Bloat] " Jonathan Morton
2011-03-14 20:24 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <1300164166.2649.70.camel@edumazet-laptop>
[not found] ` <87ipvlosvz.fsf_-_@cruithne.co.teklibre.org>
[not found] ` <1300169749.2649.142.camel@edumazet-laptop>
[not found] ` <3D05C1F1-B75E-426B-8267-6DB5323A839D@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1300213714.2927.37.camel@edumazet-laptop>
2011-03-15 18:37 ` Dave Täht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8739mogrgs.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org \
--to=d@taht.net \
--cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox