From: d@taht.net (Dave Täht)
To: bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: debloat-testing loadlatency test
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:45:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wrjsbki1.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> (raw)
Moving this convo to bloat-devel to reduce the noise level. I got my
somewhat debloated network up late last night and fired off the Path:
openrd <-> wndr3700 <-> davepc With loadlatency.
The wndr3700 has the buffer size in the ath9k driver reduced to a depth
of 3, TX_RETRIES of 4, txqueuelen of 2, and davepc is using
debloat-testing with the iwllagn driver, txqueuelen of 4. The two
devices connect at 36Mbit, however.
The conditions of this test are (purposely) poor, the two wireless
devices are separated by 3 floors, and 2 concrete walls. In other (iperf
related) testing I've seen 13% packet loss on ping.
Scenario 1: 0 uploads, 1 downloads... 2101 KiB/s down, 4.07 Hz smoothness
Scenario 2: 1 uploads, 0 downloads... 1614 KiB/s up, 4.50 Hz smoothness
Scenario 3: 0 uploads, 2 downloads... 2106 KiB/s down, 0.04 Hz smoothness
Scenario 4: 1 uploads, 1 downloads... 345 KiB/s up, 1604 KiB/s down, 0.07 Hz smoothness
Scenario 5: 2 uploads, 0 downloads... 1661 KiB/s up, 0.14 Hz smoothness
Scenario 6: 0 uploads, 3 downloads... 2100 KiB/s down, 0.04 Hz smoothness
Scenario 7: 1 uploads, 2 downloads... 244 KiB/s up, 1822 KiB/s down, 0.02 Hz smoothness
Scenario 8: 2 uploads, 1 downloads... 553 KiB/s up, 1419 KiB/s down, 0.04 Hz smoothness
Scenario 9: 3 uploads, 0 downloads... 1672 KiB/s up, 0.15 Hz smoothness
Scenario 10: 0 uploads, 4 downloads... 1845 KiB/s down, 0.01 Hz smoothness
Scenario 11: 1 uploads, 3 downloads... 186 KiB/s up, 1861 KiB/s down, 0.05 Hz smoothness
Scenario 12: 2 uploads, 2 downloads... 388 KiB/s up, 1630 KiB/s down, 0.04 Hz smoothness
Scenario 13: 3 uploads, 1 downloads... 744 KiB/s up, 1234 KiB/s down, 0.09 Hz smoothness
Scenario 14: 4 uploads, 0 downloads... 1697 KiB/s up, 0.07 Hz smoothness
Scenario 15: 0 uploads, 32 downloads... 1982 KiB/s down, 0.00 Hz smoothness
Scenario 16: 1 uploads, 31 downloads... 51 KiB/s up, 1810 KiB/s down, 0.00 Hz smoothness
Scenario 17: 16 uploads, 16 downloads...
^C
real 416m30.222s
user 3m3.230s
sys 25m41.070s
I aborted the test when I got up this morning.
--
Dave Taht
http://nex-6.taht.net
next reply other threads:[~2011-03-21 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-21 14:45 Dave Täht [this message]
2011-03-21 19:43 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-22 1:13 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-22 23:59 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-03-23 3:07 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-03-22 7:35 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-22 8:50 ` Pedro Tumusok
2011-03-22 14:15 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wrjsbki1.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org \
--to=d@taht.net \
--cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox